Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659275›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?

Marianne Cottin, Kathrin Blum, Jon Konjufca, Yamil Quevedo, Sylvia Kaaya, Alex Behn, Klaus Schmeck, Carla Sharp, Ronan Zimmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marianne CottinMillennium Institute for Research in Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile.
Kathrin BlumChild and Adolescent Psychiatric Research Department, Psychiatric University Hospitals of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jon KonjufcaUniversity of Prishtina, Pristina, Kosovo.
Yamil QuevedoMillennium Institute for Research in Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile.
Sylvia KaayaDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Science, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Alex BehnMillennium Institute for Research in Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile.
Klaus SchmeckChild and Adolescent Psychiatric Research Department, Psychiatric University Hospitals of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Carla SharpDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Ronan ZimmermannChild and Adolescent Psychiatric Research Department, Psychiatric University Hospitals of the University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. ronan.zimmermann@unibas.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

questionMost adolescents live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and about 10% of them face mental problems. The mental health provision gap in low- and middle-income countries could be addressed by evidence-based practices, however costs are implementational barriers. Digitalization can improve the accessibility of these tools and constitutes a chance for LMIC to use them more easily at a low cost. We reviewed free and brief evidence-based mental health assessment tools available for digital use to assess psychopathology across different domains in youth.

methodsFor the current study, instruments from a recent review on paper-based instruments were re-used. Additionally, a systematic search was conducted to add instruments for the personality disorder domain. We searched and classified the copyright and license terms available from the internet in terms of free usage and deliverability in a digital format. In the case that this information was insufficient, we contacted the authors.

resultsIn total, we evaluated 109 instruments. Of these instruments, 53 were free and digitally usable covering 11 mental health domains. However, retrieving information on copyright and license terms was very difficult.

conclusionsFree and digitally adaptable instruments are available, supporting the strategy of using instruments digitally to increase access. The instrument's authors support this initiative, however, the lack of copyright information and the difficulties in contacting the authors and licence holders are barriers to using this strategy in LMIC. A comprehensive, online instrument repository for clinical practice would be an appropriate next step to make the instruments more accessible and reduce implementation barriers.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPovertyAdolescentChildElectronicsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentsDigitalizationEvidence-based assessmentLow-income contextsMental health, children

Identifiers

PMID35659275
PMCPMC9166519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.