Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659258›Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2022

Perspectives of older adults, caregivers, healthcare providers on frailty screening in primary care: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

Jiahui Nan, Yunzhu Duan, Shuang Wu, Lulu Liao, Xiaoyang Li, Yinan Zhao, Hongyu Zhang, Xianmei Zeng, Hui Feng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07637890 (Designing a Multicomponent Intervention for Improving Frailty. A Pilot Study in the Basque Country), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07637890 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Designing a Multicomponent Intervention for Improving Frailty. A Pilot Study in the Basque Country

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiogipuzkoa Health Research InstituteRan2024 to 2025Enrolled32ConditionsFrailtyArmsMulti-component intervention: physical exercise, polypharmacy review and nutritional care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiahui Nan *Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yunzhu Duan *Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shuang WuXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Lulu LiaoXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiaoyang LiXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yinan ZhaoXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hongyu ZhangXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xianmei ZengXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hui FengXiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. feng.hui@csu.edu.cn.
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening is often recommended as a first step in frailty management. Many guidelines call to implicate frailty screening into practice in the primary care setting. However, few countries or organizations implement it. Understanding and clarifying the stakeholders' views and issues faced by the implementation is essential to the successful implementation of frailty screening. However, the systematic review on stakeholders' views of frailty screening in primary care is decidedly limited. Our objective was to explore the perspective of older adults, caregivers, and healthcare providers on frailty screening and determine the enablers and barriers to implementing frailty screening in primary care.

methodsA systematic search of six databases and other resources was conducted following JBI's three-step search strategy. The search resulted in 7362 articles, of which 97 were identified for further assessment according to the inclusion criteria. After the full-text screening, quality assessment and data extraction were carried out using the tools from Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Moreover, reviewers used the approach of meta-aggregative of JBI to analyze data and synthesis the findings.

resultsSix studies were included. A total of 63 findings were aggregated into 12 categories and then further grouped into three synthesized findings:1) capacity of healthcare providers and older adults; 2) opportunity in the implementation of frailty screening; 3) motivation in the implementation of frailty screening. These themes can help identify what influences the implementation of screening from the perspective of stakeholders.

conclusionsThis meta-synthesis provides evidence on the barriers and enablers of frailty screening in primary care, from the aspects of psychological, physical, social, material, etc. However, stakeholder perspectives of frailty screening have not been adequately studied. More research and efforts are needed to explore the influencing factors and address the existing barriers.

Indexed as

CaregiversFrailtyAgedHealth PersonnelHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchFrailty screeningPrimary careQualitative meta-synthesis

Identifiers

PMID35659258
PMCPMC9166584
OpenAlexW4281786367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.