SynthesisJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2022
Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Functional Outcome of Thrombectomy for Acute Posterior Circulation Artery Occlusion: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- The Value of Applying Machine Learning in Predicting the Time of Symptom Onset in Stroke Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Circulating Microglia-derived Extracellular Vesicles Predict Recovery After Rehabilitation in Stroke Survivors.Translational stroke research · 2026Trial
- Accuracy of Machine Learning to Predict Upper-Limb Outcome Within the First 72 Hours Poststroke.Stroke · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Physical Therapy: A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications Across the Patient and Client Management Model.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted gait training on functional ambulation in patients with stroke: a retrospective real-world analysis across five robotic devices.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Stroke Rehabilitation: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Health Trends and Technologies.Brain and behavior · 2026Review
- Explainable machine learning prediction of functional independence measure scores and gain in subacute stroke survivors.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- A Streamlined 4-item Wolf Motor Function Test for Efficient Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2026Article
- Article
- Early prediction of periventricular leukomalacia from MRI changes: a machine learning approach for risk stratification.European radiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing upper limb motor recovery prediction after acute stroke using EEG and subacute data.APL bioengineering · 2026Article
- Current State of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Stroke: A Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- From fragmented neurotechnologies to closed-loop brain health systems: integrating artificial intelligence, digital health, digital twins, and advanced materials for brain disorders.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Neurorehabilitation for cognitive and motor recovery: mechanisms, interventions, and translational advances.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction and Management of Stroke Rehabilitation.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- A Machine Learning-Based Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in BCLC Stage 0-B Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Low HALP Score.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of an artificial intelligence-driven precision rehabilitation model for ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Can machine learning improve on the early prediction of upper limb recovery after stroke?Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRehabilitation medicine is facing a new development phase thanks to a recent wave of rigorous clinical trials aimed at improving the scientific evidence of protocols. This phenomenon, combined with new trends in personalised medical therapies, is expected to change clinical practice dramatically. The emerging field of Rehabilomics is only possible if methodologies are based on biomedical data collection and analysis. In this framework, the objective of this work is to develop a systematic review of machine learning algorithms as solutions to predict motor functional recovery of post-stroke patients after treatment.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of five electronic databases using the Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) format. We extracted health conditions, population characteristics, outcome assessed, the method for feature extraction and selection, the algorithm used, and the validation approach. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). A qualitative description of the characteristics of the included studies as well as a narrative data synthesis was performed.
resultsA total of 19 primary studies were included. The predictors most frequently used belonged to the areas of demographic characteristics and stroke assessment through clinical examination. Regarding the methods, linear and logistic regressions were the most frequently used and cross-validation was the preferred validation approach.
conclusionsWe identified several methodological limitations: small sample sizes, a limited number of external validation approaches, and high heterogeneity among input and output variables. Although these elements prevented a quantitative comparison across models, we defined the most frequently used models given a specific outcome, providing useful indications for the application of more complex machine learning algorithms in rehabilitation medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.