Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659237›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2022

Correlated physical and mental health composite scores for the RAND-36 and RAND-12 health surveys: can we keep them simple?

John Roger Andersen, Kyrre Breivik, Inger Elise Engelund, Marjolein M Iversen, Jorunn Kirkeleit, Tone Merete Norekvål, Kjersti Oterhals, Anette Storesund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John Roger AndersenDepartment of Research and Development, Centre on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway. johnra@hvl.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-9086
Kyrre BreivikDepartment of Research and Development, Centre on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway.
Inger Elise EngelundDepartment of Research and Development, Centre on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway.
Marjolein M IversenDepartment of Research and Development, Centre on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway.
Jorunn KirkeleitDepartment of Research and Development, Centre on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway.
Tone Merete NorekvålDepartment of Research and Development, Centre on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway.
Kjersti OterhalsDepartment of Research and Development, Centre on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway.
Anette StoresundDepartment of Research and Development, Centre on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Bergen Hospital Trust, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe RAND-36 and RAND-12 (equivalent to versions 1 of the SF-36 Health Survey and SF-12 Health Survey, respectively) are widely used measures of health-related quality of life. However, there are diverging views regarding how to create the physical health and mental health composite scores of these questionnaires. We present a simple approach using an unweighted linear combination of subscale scores for constructing composite scores for physical and mental health that assumes these scores should be free to correlate. The aim of this study was to investigate the criterion validity and convergent validity of these scores.

methodsWe investigated oblique and unweighted RAND-36/12 composite scores from a random sample of the general Norwegian population (N = 2107). Criterion validity was tested by examining the correlation between unweighted composite scores and weighted scores derived from oblique principal component analysis. Convergent validity was examined by analysing the associations between the different composite scores, age, gender, body mass index, physical activity, rheumatic disease, and depression.

resultsThe correlations between the composite scores derived by the two methods were substantial (r = 0.97 to 0.99) for both the RAND-36 and RAND-12. The effect sizes of the associations between the oblique versus the unweighted composite scores and other variables had comparable magnitudes.

conclusionThe unweighted RAND-36 and RAND-12 composite scores demonstrated satisfactory criterion validity and convergent validity. This suggests that if the physical and mental composite scores are free to be correlated, the calculation of these composite scores can be kept simple.

Indexed as

Mental HealthQuality of LifeHealth SurveysHumansPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesMCSObliquePCSPsychometric propertiesRAND-12RAND-36SF-12SF-36UnweightedValidity

Identifiers

PMID35659237
PMCPMC9166415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.