Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659232›Full record

ReviewMalaria journal2022

Motivators and demotivators to accessing malaria in pregnancy interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-ethnographic review.

Matilda Aberese-Ako, Phidelia Doegah, Evelyn Acquah, Pascal Magnussen, Evelyn Ansah, Gifty Ampofo, Dominic Dankwah Agyei, Desmond Klu, Elsie Mottey, Julie Balen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Matilda Aberese-AkoUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana. maberese-ako@uhas.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-5939
Phidelia DoegahUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Evelyn AcquahUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Pascal MagnussenFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Centre for Medical Parasitology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Evelyn AnsahUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Gifty AmpofoUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Dominic Dankwah AgyeiUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Desmond KluUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Elsie MotteyUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Julie BalenSchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Safiatou DoumboUniversity of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, Malaria Research and Training Center, Bamako, Mali.
Wilfred MbachamThe Fobang Institutes for Innovations in Science and Technologies & The Biotechnology Center, The Centre for Health Innovations and Translational Research, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Ouma GayeFaculty of Medicine, University Cheikh Anta Diop Dakar, Dakar, Senegal.
Margaret GyapongUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Seth Owusu-AgyeiUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
Harry TagborUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
University of Health and Allied Sciences · GHCheikh Anta Diop University · SNUniversité de Yaoundé I · CMUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT: 107741/A/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the introduction of efficacious interventions for malaria control, sub-Saharan Africa continues to bear the highest burden of malaria and its associated effects on vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women and children. This meta-ethnographic review contributes to literature on malaria in pregnancy interventions in sub-Saharan Africa by offering insights into the multiple factors that motivate or demotivate women from accessing MiP interventions.

methodsA meta-ethnographic approach was used for the synthesis. Original qualitative research articles published from 2010 to November 2021 in English in sub-Saharan Africa were searched for. Articles focusing on WHO's recommended interventions such as intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, long-lasting insecticidal nets and testing and treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy (MiP) were included. Selected articles were uploaded into Nvivo 11 for thematic coding and synthesis.

resultsTwenty-seven original qualitative research articles were included in the analysis. Main factors motivating uptake of MiP interventions were: (1) well organized ANC, positive attitudes of health workers and availability of MiP services; (2) Women's knowledge of the effects of malaria in pregnancy, previous experience of accessing responsive ANC; (3) financial resources and encouragement from partners, relatives and friends and (4) favourable weather condition and nearness to a health facility. Factors that demotivated women from using MiP services were: (1) stock-outs, ANC charges and health providers failure to provide women with ample education on the need for MiP care; (2) perception of not being at risk and the culture of self-medication; (3) fear of being bewitched if pregnancy was noticed early, women's lack of decision-making power and dependence on traditional remedies and (4) warm weather, long distances to health facilities and the style of construction of houses making it difficult to hang LLINs.

conclusionsHealth system gaps need to be strengthened in order to ensure that MiP interventions become accessible to women. Additionally, health managers need to involve communities in planning, designing and implementing malaria interventions for pregnant women. It is important that the health system engage extensively with communities to facilitate pregnant women and communities understanding of MiP interventions and the need to support pregnant women to access them.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsMalariaPregnancy Complications, ParasiticAfrica South of the SaharaChildFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleAntimalarialsCommunityDe(motivators)EnvironmentHealth systemIndividualInterventionsMalaria in pregnancySocio-culturalSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID35659232
PMCPMC9166609
OpenAlexW4281656032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.