ArticleBMC cancer2022
Is it sufficient to evaluate metastatic bone involvement in breast cancer using SPECT/CT? A new approach of SPECT/CT-guided targeted bone marrow biopsy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of quantitative SPECT/CT integrated parameters for differentiating spinal tuberculosis from spinal metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Multi-site bone marrow core biopsy improves diagnostic accuracy in dogs with hematologic disease.PloS one · 2026Article
- 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in the localization of the lesions in the osteogenic region of breast cancer bone metastases after therapy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Recent nanotheranostic approaches in cancer research.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Unique macrophage phenotypes activated by BMP signaling in breast cancer bone metastases.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Clinical application of real-time PET/CT guided targeted retroperitoneal masses biopsy in diagnosing malignant tumors.BMC cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the feasibility, safety, and clinical application value of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT)-guided bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in breast cancer (BC) patients with suspected bone metastases (BM) and compare its diagnostic performance for detection of BM with SPECT/CT.
methodsThe records of breast cancer patients referred for bone scintigraphy (BS), SPECT/CT and SPECT/CT-guided BMB from January of 2018 to June of 2021 in our hospital were retrospectively reviewed. 49 Patients were consecutively included in this study, all 49 specimens were analyzed by pathological and immunohistochemical studies.The biopsy success rate, total examination time, biopsy operation time, complications, CT radiation dose, and pathological and immunohistochemical results were recorded. The diagnostic performance based on SPECT/CT and SPECT/CT-guided BMB were compared with pathological, immunohistochemical examinations and the results of subsequent follow-up.
resultsBone samples of the sites with high uptake were obtained in all 49 patients under BMB. No severe postoperative complications occurred. Among all 49 cases, 34 specimens were positive for metastatic breast cancer (69%, 34/49), and positive for benign tissue in 15 cases (31%, 15/49). 1 case of 15 cases was subsequently diagnosed as metastatic breast cancer according to the follow-up result. SPECT/CT-guided BMB demonstrated significantly higher negative predictive value (NPV) when compared to SPECT/CT (p = 0.021 < 0.05). Patients with differential expression of ER, PR, and HER-2 between primary lesions and metastatic lesions accounted for 12, 17, and 5 cases, respectively, and the changing rates were 35.2% (12/34), 50% (17/34), and 14.7% (5/34), respectively. Molecular subtype changes occurred in 7 patients, accounting for 47% (16/34) of metastatic patients.
conclusionIt is insufficient to evaluate BM in BC patients using SPECT/CT imaging. SPECT/CT-guided BMB provided significantly higher sensitivity and NPV than SPECT/CT for detection of BM in BC patients. Our research redefines a new approach which can confirm diagnosis and potential molecular subtype changes for suspected bone metastatic lesions in BC patients, which can offer important opportunities for precision treatment and improved quality of life of BC patients with BM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.