Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35659156›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2022

Implementation and modification of an organizational-level intervention: a prospective analysis.

Elisa J Gordon, Jefferson J Uriarte, Naomi Anderson, Elida Romo, Juan Carlos Caicedo, Michelle Shumate

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03276390 (A Culturally Targeted Transplant Program to Increase Live Donation in Hispanics), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03276390 nacompletednot on this map

A Culturally Targeted Transplant Program to Increase Live Donation in Hispanics

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled11,836ConditionsESRDArmsHispanic Kidney Transplant Program (HKTP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisa J GordonDepartment of Surgery - Division of Transplantation, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 N. St. Clair, 20th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. e-gordon@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0969-1998
Jefferson J UriarteCenter for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8507-963X
Naomi AndersonSchool of Education and Policy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8991-9739
Elida RomoDepartment of Neurology - Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6057-301X
Juan Carlos CaicedoDepartment of Surgery - Division of Transplantation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michelle ShumateDepartment of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4998-0463

Funding

A Culturally Targeted Transplant Program to Increase Live Donation in HispanicsR01DK104876 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CAICEDO, JUAN C, GORDON, ELISA J · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModifications to interventions can jeopardize intervention outcomes. Pre-existing perceived barriers and facilitators to the intervention arising in the implementation preparation phase may help explain why modifications to the intervention may occur during the implementation phase. This two-site comparative case study describes modifications made to a complex organizational-level intervention and examines how known implementation science factors may have enabled such changes to occur.

methodsNorthwestern Medicine's

resultsAcross sites, 57 stakeholders participated in an interview, group discussion, and/or learning collaborative discussion. Site-B made more modifications than Site-A (n = 29 versus n = 18). Sites differed in the proportions of delaying/skipping (Site-A 50% versus Site-B 28%) and adding (Site-A 11% versus Site-B 28%) but had comparable substituting (Site-A 17% versus Site-B 17%) and tweaking (Site-A 17% versus Site-B 14%) modification types. Across sites, the transplant team consistently initiated the most modifications (Site-A 66%; Site-B 62%). While individuals initiated slightly more modifications at Site-B (21% versus Site-A 17%), institutions instigated proportionately slightly more modifications at Site-A (17% versus Site-B 10%). CFIR inner setting factors (i.e., structural characteristics, culture, available resources, implementation climate) that prominently emerged during the implementation preparation phase explained similarities and differences in sites' modification numbers, types, and agents in the implementation phase.

conclusionOrganizations implementing a culturally competent care intervention made modifications. CFIR inner setting factors emerging in the implementation preparation phase largely explained similarities and differences in study sites' modifications. Identifying factors contributing to modifications may help institutions become better prepared to implement an intervention by addressing known factors in advance, which may foster greater fidelity leading to desired outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03276390 . We registered the study retrospectively on 9-7-17.

Indexed as

Complex interventionsCulturally competent careEnd-stage kidney diseaseEquityHealth disparitiesHospital-based interventionHybrid studyOrganizational cultureOrganizational-level intervention

Identifiers

PMID35659156
PMCPMC9164326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.