Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658979›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2022

Assessment of health state utilities in dermatology: an experimental time trade-off value set for the dermatology life quality index.

Gábor Ruzsa, Fanni Rencz, Valentin Brodszky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predicting EQ-5D-3L utility values from clinical data in a prospective cohort of kidney transplant recipients.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Observational
  2. Comparing EQ-5D-5L, PROPr, SF-6D and TTO utilities in patients with chronic skin diseases.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gábor RuzsaDepartment of Statistics, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary. ruzsagab@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6817-6454
Fanni RenczDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-620X
Valentin BrodszkyDepartment of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6095-2295

Funding

Corvinus University of Budapest TKP2020‑IKA‑02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores are used in many countries as access and reimbursement criteria for costly dermatological treatments. In this study we examined how time trade-off (TTO) utility valuations made by individuals from the general population are related to combinations of DLQI severity levels characterizing dermatologically relevant health states, with the ultimate purpose of developing a value set for the DLQI.

methodsWe used data from an online cross-sectional survey conducted in Hungary in 2020 (n = 842 after sample exclusions). Respondents were assigned to one of 18 random blocks and were asked to provide 10-year TTO valuations for the corresponding five hypothetical health states. To analyze the relationship between DLQI severity levels and utility valuations, we estimated linear, censored, ordinal, and beta regression models, complemented by two-part scalable models accommodating heterogeneity effects in respondents' valuation scale usage. Successive severity levels (0-3) of each DLQI item were represented by dummy variables. We used cross-validation methods to reduce the initial set of 30 dummy variables and improve model robustness.

resultsOur final, censored linear regression model with 13 dummy variables had R

conclusionsWe have developed an experimental value set for the DLQI, which could prospectively be used for quantifying the quality-adjusted life years impact of dermatological treatments and serve as a basis for cost-effectiveness analyses. We suggest that, after validation of our main results through confirmatory studies, population-specific DLQI value sets could be developed and used for conducting cost-effectiveness analyses and developing financing guidelines in dermatological care.

Indexed as

DermatologyQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesHealth StatusHumansSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesDermatology life quality indexHealth-related quality of lifeTime trade-offUtilityValue set

Identifiers

PMID35658979
PMCPMC9164408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.