Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658949›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Identifying the determinants of patient satisfaction in the context of antenatal care in Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi using service provision assessment data.

Kate Bergh, Sebawit Bishu, Henock B Taddese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Indigenous Cancer Palliative Care Services.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate BerghSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Medical School Building, St Mary's Hospital, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK. katebergh@outlook.com.
Sebawit BishuEvans School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Washington Seattle, University of Washington, Box 353055, Seattle, WA, 98195-3055, USA.
Henock B TaddeseSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Medical School Building, St Mary's Hospital, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntenatal care (ANC) is a service that can reduce the incidence of maternal and neonatal deaths when provided by skilled healthcare workers. Patient satisfaction is an important health system responsiveness goal which has been shown to influence adherence to healthcare interventions. This study aims to assess the determinants of pregnant women's satisfaction with ANC across Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi using nationally representative Service Provision Assessment data.

methodsPatient satisfaction was conceptualised mainly based on Donabedian's theory of healthcare quality with patient characteristics, structure, and process as the major determinants. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the potential determinants.

resultsFindings show that satisfaction was negatively associated with women's age (AOR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92-0.99) and having a secondary (AOR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17-0.87) or tertiary education (AOR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.99) in Kenya. Women on their first pregnancy were more likely to report satisfaction in Tanzania (AOR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.00-2.62) while women were less likely to report being satisfied in their second trimester in Malawi (AOR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.09-0.97). The important structural and process factors for patient satisfaction included: private versus public run facilities in Kenya (AOR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.22-3.43) and Malawi (AOR: 1.85; 95% CI: 0.99-3.43); level of provider training, that is, specialist versus enrolled nurse in Tanzania (AOR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.13-0.93) or clinical technician in Malawi (AOR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01-0.36); and shorter waiting times across all countries.

conclusionFindings highlight the importance of professional proficiency and efficient service delivery in determining pregnant women's satisfaction with ANC. Future studies should incorporate both patient characteristics and institutional factors at health facilities into their conceptualisation of patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPrenatal CareFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornKenyaMalawiPregnancyTanzaniaAntenatal carePatient satisfactionQuality of careSub-Saharan AfricaWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID35658949
PMCPMC9167501
OpenAlexW4281672893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.