ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2022
Micro-magnetic stimulation of primary visual cortex induces focal and sustained activation of secondary visual cortex.
Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfabrication Technologies for Nanoinvasive and High-Resolution Magnetic Neuromodulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Patterned electrical brain stimulation by a wireless network of implantable microdevices.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Micro-magnetic stimulation of primary visual cortex induces focal and sustained activation of secondary visual cortex.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022Article
- Preface to 'Advanced neurotechnologies: translating innovation for health and well-being'.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cortical visual prostheses that aim to restore sight to the blind require the ability to create neural activity in the visual cortex. Electric stimulation delivered via microelectrodes implanted in the primary visual cortex (V1) has been the most common approach, although conventional electrodes may not effectively confine activation to focal regions and thus the acuity they create may be limited. Magnetic stimulation from microcoils confines activation to single cortical columns of V1 and thus may prove to be more effective than conventional microelectrodes, but the ability of microcoils to drive synaptic connections has not been explored. Here, we show that magnetic stimulation of V1 using microcoils induces spatially confined activation in the secondary visual cortex (V2) in mouse brain slices. Single-loop microcoils were fabricated using platinum-iridium flat microwires, and their effectiveness was evaluated using calcium imaging and compared with that of monopolar and bipolar electrodes. Our results show that compared to the electrodes, the microcoils better confined activation to a small region in V1. In addition, they produced more precise and sustained activation in V2. The finding that microcoil-based stimulation propagates to higher visual centres raises the possibility that complex visual perception, e.g. that requiring sustained synaptic inputs, may be achievable. This article is part of the theme issue 'Advanced neurotechnologies: translating innovation for health and well-being'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.