Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658677›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2022

Micro-magnetic stimulation of primary visual cortex induces focal and sustained activation of secondary visual cortex.

Seung Woo Lee, Shelley I Fried

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microfabrication Technologies for Nanoinvasive and High-Resolution Magnetic Neuromodulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Micro-magnetic stimulation of primary visual cortex induces focal and sustained activation of secondary visual cortex.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Preface to 'Advanced neurotechnologies: translating innovation for health and well-being'.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seung Woo LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4070-809X
Shelley I FriedDepartment of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6456-8656
Harvard University · US

Funding

Investigating the Response of CNS Neurons to Electric and Magnetic StimulationR01NS110575 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
Micro-coil implants for cortical activationU01NS099700 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2016 to 2018
$2.9M
Optimization of micro-coil arrays for precise stimulation of visual cortexR01EY029022 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029022NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110575NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortical visual prostheses that aim to restore sight to the blind require the ability to create neural activity in the visual cortex. Electric stimulation delivered via microelectrodes implanted in the primary visual cortex (V1) has been the most common approach, although conventional electrodes may not effectively confine activation to focal regions and thus the acuity they create may be limited. Magnetic stimulation from microcoils confines activation to single cortical columns of V1 and thus may prove to be more effective than conventional microelectrodes, but the ability of microcoils to drive synaptic connections has not been explored. Here, we show that magnetic stimulation of V1 using microcoils induces spatially confined activation in the secondary visual cortex (V2) in mouse brain slices. Single-loop microcoils were fabricated using platinum-iridium flat microwires, and their effectiveness was evaluated using calcium imaging and compared with that of monopolar and bipolar electrodes. Our results show that compared to the electrodes, the microcoils better confined activation to a small region in V1. In addition, they produced more precise and sustained activation in V2. The finding that microcoil-based stimulation propagates to higher visual centres raises the possibility that complex visual perception, e.g. that requiring sustained synaptic inputs, may be achievable. This article is part of the theme issue 'Advanced neurotechnologies: translating innovation for health and well-being'.

Indexed as

Primary Visual CortexVisual CortexAnimalsElectric StimulationMagnetic PhenomenaMiceVisual Perceptionimplantable microcoilinter-areal signal propagationmicro-magnetic stimulation (µms)primary visual cortex (V1)secondary visual cortex (V2)visual prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID35658677
PMCPMC11493182
OpenAlexW4281911490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.