Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658597›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

British Columbia's Experience after Implementation of the Treponema pallidum Reverse Algorithm and PCR Detection, 2015 to 2020.

Muhammad Morshed, Min-Kuang Lee, Jonathan Laley, Darrel Cook, Annie Mak, Navdeep Chahil, Venessa Ryan, Carolyn Montgomery, Sylvia Makaroff, Sarah Malleson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Syphilis in pregnancy: A practical guide for prenatal care providers.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  5. The Proportion ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  6. Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network National Syphilis In-Laboratory Serological Testing Recommendations.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2025
    Review
  7. An Update on the Status of Direct Testing forJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad MorshedBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1841-9320
Min-Kuang LeeBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jonathan LaleyBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Darrel CookClinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Controlgrid.418246.d, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1958-120X
Annie MakBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Navdeep ChahilBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Venessa RyanClinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Controlgrid.418246.d, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Carolyn MontgomeryClinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Controlgrid.418246.d, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sylvia MakaroffClinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Controlgrid.418246.d, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah MallesonClinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Controlgrid.418246.d, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Barbra ArnoldClinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Controlgrid.418246.d, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Troy GrennanClinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Controlgrid.418246.d, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jason WongClinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Controlgrid.418246.d, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mel KrajdenBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
BC Centre for Disease Control · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

British Columbia (BC) implemented the syphilis reverse screening algorithm and Treponema pallidum PCR testing in 2014. We summarize the performance characteristics of the algorithm, together with PCR direct detection, and report on syphilis cases identified from 2015 to 2020. Prior to 2015, samples for syphilis diagnosis were first screened by rapid plasma reagin (RPR). As of 2015, sera were screened by the Siemens Advia Centaur syphilis assay (enzyme immunoassay [EIA]). Positive and equivocal samples were reflex tested by a T. pallidum passive particle agglutination assay (TPPA) and RPR. We used T. pallidum DNA PCR on clinical samples and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to identify azithromycin resistance mutations. Case/epidemiological data were obtained from the BC surveillance system. Of 1,631,519 samples screened by the EIA, 72,492 (4.4%) were positive and 187 (<0.1%) were equivocal. Of EIA-positive/equivocal samples, 10.6% were false positive, and false positivity was higher at lower EIA indices. The reverse algorithm detected 4,693 late latent syphilis cases that likely would have been missed by RPR screening. PCR had a very high sensitivity of 100% versus 52.9% and 52.4% for dark-field (DF) and immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy, respectively. The azithromycin resistance mutation A2058G was identified in 96% of PCR-positive samples, and A2059G was identified in 4%. Annually, there were 944 to 1,467 syphilis cases, with 62% in men who reported male sexual partners. The reverse algorithm had a low false-positive rate and very few equivocal screening results but did identify previously undiagnosed late latent syphilis cases. PCR was more sensitive than both DF and IF microscopy for direct diagnosis and enabled monitoring for azithromycin resistance.

Indexed as

SyphilisTreponema pallidumAlgorithmsAzithromycinBritish ColumbiaHumansMalePolymerase Chain ReactionAzithromycinPCRreverse algorithmscreeningsyphilis

Identifiers

PMID35658597
PMCPMC9241594
OpenAlexW4281685115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.