Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658589›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2023

Disparities in Elective Spine Surgery for Medicaid Beneficiaries: A Systematic Review.

Daniel Badin, Carlos Ortiz-Babilonia, Farah N Musharbash, Amit Jain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cluster Analysis reveals Socioeconomic Disparities among Elective Spine Surgery Patients.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel BadinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1500Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4769-3986
Carlos Ortiz-BabiloniaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1500Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0722-6937
Farah N MusharbashDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1500Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amit JainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1500Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9983-3365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic review.

objectivesWe sought to synthesize the literature investigating the disparities that Medicaid patients sustain with regards to 2 types of elective spine surgery, lumbar fusion (LF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

methodsOur review was constructed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and protocol. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. We included studies comparing Medicaid beneficiaries to other payer categories with regards to rates of LF and ACDF, costs/reimbursement, and health outcomes.

resultsA total of 573 articles were assessed. Twenty-five articles were included in the analysis. We found that the literature is consistent with regards to Medicaid disparities. Medicaid was strongly associated with decreased access to LF and ACDF, lower reimbursement rates, and worse health outcomes (such as higher rates of readmission and emergency department utilization) compared to other insurance categories.

conclusionsIn adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery, Medicaid insurance is associated with wide disparities with regards to access to care and health outcomes. Efforts should focus on identifying causes and interventions for such disparities in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

costsdisparitieshealthcare accesshealth outcomesmedicaidspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID35658589
PMCPMC9972279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.