Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658586›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine

Hematologic reference intervals for healthy adult Saudis in Riyadh.

Salwa Bakr, Areej AlFattani, Randa Al-Nounou, Nasir Bakshi, Haitham Khogeer, Maha Alharbi, Nasser Almousa, Waleed Alomaim, Amelita Aguilos, May Almashary and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Common Hematological Reference Indices Among Healthy Reproductive Age Indian Women-Data Subset from Nationwide Study.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Salwa BakrFrom the Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Areej AlFattaniFrom the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Scientific Computing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Randa Al-NounouFrom the Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nasir BakshiFrom the Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Haitham KhogeerFrom the Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maha AlharbiFrom the Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nasser AlmousaFrom the Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Waleed AlomaimFrom the Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amelita AguilosFrom the Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
May AlmasharyFrom the College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tarek OwaidahFrom the Department of Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9399-300X
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAAlfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaboratory hematological tests are widely used in clinical practice to assess health and disease conditions. Reference ranges provided by laboratory reports are considered the most authoritative medical tools to assist in the decision-making phase. International standards institutes recommend that reference ranges be established for each region.

objectivesProvide reference values of routine hematological parameters in Saudi adults according to age and gender.

designCross-sectional

settingCentral province of Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND

methodsApparently healthy Saudi adults were subjected to laboratory testing of routine hematological parameters (full blood count, hemostatic profile, and serum hematinics), after completing a detailed health medical questionnaire.

main outcome measuresHematological reference values based on the local population. SAMPLE SIZE AND CHARACTERISTICS: 637 after screening 827 potentially healthy Saudi adults with ages ranging from 15 to 65 years.

resultsThe reference values of routine hematological parameters for the full population and by gender are presented with 90% CI as the lower and upper limits. Reference ranges mostly differed from universal established ranges shown in textbooks.

conclusionThe reference ranges of routine hematologic parameters for accurate assessment and appropriate management will help improve the routine clinical care of the adult Saudi population. LIMITATIONS: Difficulty in assessing health status of participants, who could have subclinical illnesses not reflected in the evaluated blood measurement. Lack of ability to eliminate individuals who might be carriers for haemoglobinopathies. Studies with larger sample sizes from different areas of the country are required to achieve a more accurate representation of the whole Saudi population. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

Hematologic TestsAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedReference ValuesSaudi ArabiaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35658586
PMCPMC9167458
OpenAlexW4281759193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.