Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658582›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine

Histopathological pattern of endometrial biopsies in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding in a tertiary referral hospital in Jordan.

Eman Husssein Alshdaifat, Sami Saif El-Deen Al-Horani, Majd Mahmoud Al-Sous, Sharaf Al-Horani, Fernas Emile Sahawneh, Amer Mahmoud Sindiani

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eman Husssein AlshdaifatFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-2096-3165
Sami Saif El-Deen Al-HoraniFrom the Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Majd Mahmoud Al-SousFrom the Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Sharaf Al-HoraniFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Fernas Emile SahawnehFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Amer Mahmoud SindianiFrom Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JOYarmouk University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a symptom that deviates from the normal menstrual cycle. AUB is characterized by changes in the frequency, volume, and duration of the menstrual flow. The etiology of AUB, which varies with age, may be attributed to both structural and non-structural causes.

objectivesDetermine the histopathological pattern of endometrial biopsies in patients with AUB across different age and parity groups who have undergone dilation and curettage (D&C), along with the discrepancy between D&C and histopathological findings after hysterectomy.

designRetrospective chart review

settingTertiary referral hospital PATIENTS AND

methodsWe collected data on all patients diagnosed with AUB between January 2015 and December 2020. Histopathological findings of all D&C endometrial biopsy samples were examined after being categorized by age and parity groups. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and NPV were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of D&C.

main outcome measuresHistopathological pattern of D&C endometrial biopsies by age and parity groups. SAMPLE SIZE: 3233 patients.

resultsMost patients were in the 18-39 year age group, with normal cyclical findings being the most common histopathological finding. Malignant lesions were observed in 42 patients with a majority being older than 50 years. In 13.3% (42/316) of patients, D&C failed to detect intrauterine disorder that was found on hysterectomy. The overall accuracy of D&C in determining the existence of normal versus pathological findings was 75.60%, the sensitivity was 72.90%, the specificity was 77.90%, the positive predictive value was 73.86% and the NPV was 77.05% in our patients.

conclusionNormal cyclic changes account for the highest proportion of histopathological findings. However, hyperplasia and malignancies are important causes of perimenopausal and postmenopausal bleeding. While the use of D&C as a sampling tool for AUB cases remains questionable, the use of D&C in diagnosing premalignant and malignant cases is highly effective. LIMITATIONS: Single-center, retrospective design, incomplete medical records, and inter-rater reliability could not be determined. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Indexed as

Uterine HemorrhageBiopsyFemaleHumansJordanPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care Centers

Identifiers

PMID35658582
PMCPMC9167457
OpenAlexW4281781201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.