Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658516›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2022

Candidate Phyla Radiation, an Underappreciated Division of the Human Microbiome, and Its Impact on Health and Disease.

Sabrina Naud, Ahmad Ibrahim, Camille Valles, Mohamad Maatouk, Fadi Bittar, Maryam Tidjani Alou, Didier Raoult

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Novel Pilus System in Candidate Phyla Radiation Bacteria.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Beyond genomics in Patescibacteria: A trove of unexplored biology packed into ultrasmall bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabrina NaudAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.
Ahmad IbrahimAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.
Camille VallesAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.
Mohamad MaatoukAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.
Fadi BittarAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4052-344X
Maryam Tidjani AlouAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-6235
Didier RaoultAix-Marseille Université, IRD, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0633-5974
Aix-Marseille Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candidate phyla radiation (CPR) is an emerging division of the bacterial domain within the human microbiota. Still poorly known, these microorganisms were first described in the environment in 1981 as "ultramicrobacteria" with a cell volume under 0.1 μm

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaDysbiosisHumansMouthcandidate phyla radiationdysbiosisgenome analysishuman microbiomeimagingtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID35658516
PMCPMC9491188
OpenAlexW4281642528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.