Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658497›Full record

ReviewAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting2022

Contemporary Approach to Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy in 2022.

Gregory W Roloff, Olatoyosi Odenike, Ashish Bajel, Andrew H Wei, Nicole Foley, Geoffrey L Uy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. MYB as a Critical Transcription Factor and Potential Therapeutic Target in AML.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Novel therapies upon failure of HMA plus venetoclax.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gregory W RoloffSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Olatoyosi OdenikeSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Ashish BajelDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew H WeiDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Nicole FoleyDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Geoffrey L UyDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.

Funding

BASIC RESEARCH TRAINING IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGYT32CA009566 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLUFUNMILAYO F. OLOPADE · 1987 to 2026
$10.5M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in acute myeloid leukemia biology and drug development have transformed the therapeutic landscape for patients diagnosed with this disease. By harnessing insights from the study of the molecular pathogenesis of the disease, the acute myeloid leukemia treatment armamentarium now extends beyond conventional cytotoxic agents to include targeted therapies, and immunotherapeutics, with multiple novel modalities under investigation. During the past 5 years, recent drug approvals have also focused attention on disease scenarios and patient populations for whom newer therapies might be deployed. In this review, we highlight select acute myeloid leukemia therapies in the frontline setting through the lens of both disease and patient-related factors. Particular emphasis is placed on the assessment of patient fitness, as contemporary acute myeloid leukemia therapy decisions largely hinge on the determination of whether intensive chemotherapy is suitable for a patient. Additionally, we detail scenarios and areas of controversy wherein disease biology may inspire a reframing of traditional intensive treatment philosophies, regardless of patient fitness. Lastly, we provide an overview of emerging agents that are being investigated in the relapsed/refractory setting.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansRemission Induction

Identifiers

PMID35658497
PMCPMC12105117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.