Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658077›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Repeated translocation of a supergene underlying rapid sex chromosome turnover in

Ahammad Kabir, Risa Ieda, Sho Hosoya, Daigaku Fujikawa, Kazufumi Atsumi, Shota Tajima, Aoi Nozawa, Takashi Koyama, Shotaro Hirase, Osamu Nakamura and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Parsimony and Poeciliid Sex Chromosome Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ahammad KabirFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.
Risa IedaFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.
Sho HosoyaFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.
Daigaku FujikawaFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.
Kazufumi AtsumiFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.
Shota TajimaFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.
Aoi NozawaFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.
Takashi KoyamaFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7140-7244
Shotaro HiraseFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.
Osamu NakamuraSchool of Marine Biosciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara 252-0373, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0374-7519
Mitsutaka KadotaLaboratory for Phyloinformatics, RIKEN Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1674-6697
Osamu NishimuraLaboratory for Phyloinformatics, RIKEN Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1969-2580
Shigehiro KurakuLaboratory for Phyloinformatics, RIKEN Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1464-8388
Yasukazu NakamuraGenome Informatics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6782-5715
Hisato KobayashiNodai Genome Research Center, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Setagaya 156-8502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3800-4691
Atsushi ToyodaComparative Genomics Laboratory, Center for Information Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0728-7548
Satoshi TasumiFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.
Kiyoshi KikuchiFisheries Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Hamamatsu 431-0214, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5435-198X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have revealed a surprising diversity of sex chromosomes in vertebrates. However, the detailed mechanism of their turnover is still elusive. To understand this process, it is necessary to compare closely related species in terms of sex-determining genes and the chromosomes harboring them. Here, we explored the genus Takifugu, in which one strong candidate sex-determining gene, Amhr2, has been identified. To trace the processes involved in transitions in the sex-determination system in this genus, we studied 12 species and found that while the Amhr2 locus likely determines sex in the majority of Takifugu species, three species have acquired sex-determining loci at different chromosomal locations. Nevertheless, the generation of genome assemblies for the three species revealed that they share a portion of the male-specific supergene that contains a candidate sex-determining gene, GsdfY, along with genes that potentially play a role in male fitness. The shared supergene spans ∼100 kb and is flanked by two duplicated regions characterized by CACTA transposable elements. These results suggest that the shared supergene has taken over the role of sex-determining locus from Amhr2 in lineages leading to the three species, and repeated translocations of the supergene underlie the turnover of sex chromosomes in these lineages. These findings highlight the underestimated role of a mobile supergene in the turnover of sex chromosomes in vertebrates.

Indexed as

Sex Determination ProcessesTakifuguAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularSex ChromosomesTranslocation, GeneticDNA Transposable Elementssex chromosome evolutionsex-determining genestructural variantstransposon

Identifiers

PMID35658077
PMCPMC9191631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.