Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658048›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Potential role of conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography in the screening of structural and functional cardiac abnormalities in elderly individuals: Baseline echocardiographic findings from the LOOP study.

Flemming Javier Olsen, Søren Zöga Diederichsen, Peter Godsk Jørgensen, Magnus T Jensen, Anders Dahl, Nino Emmanuel Landler, Claus Graff, Axel Brandes, Derk Krieger, Ketil Haugan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Heart Failure in Older Patients: An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Flemming Javier OlsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9511-8375
Søren Zöga DiederichsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9687-0857
Peter Godsk JørgensenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Magnus T JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Anders DahlDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Nino Emmanuel LandlerDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5255-787X
Claus GraffDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Axel BrandesDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9145-6887
Derk KriegerUniversity Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ketil HauganDepartment of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5584-8445
Lars KøberDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren HøjbergDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper Hastrup SvendsenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tor Biering-SørensenDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKGentofte Hospital · DKAalborg University · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly individuals occupy an increasing part of the general population. Conventional and speckle-tracking transthoracic echocardiography may help guide risk stratification in these individuals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential utility of conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography in the screening of cardiac abnormalities in the elderly population.

methodsTwo cohorts of elderly individuals (sample size: 1441 and 944) were analyzed, who were part of a randomized controlled clinical trial (LOOP study) and of an observational study (Copenhagen City Heart Study), recruiting participants from the general population >70 years of age with cardiovascular risk factors (arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, or prior stroke) and sinus rhythm. Participants underwent a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination, including myocardial speckle tracking. Cardiac abnormalities were defined according to the ASE/EACVI guidelines.

resultsStructural cardiac abnormalities such as left ventricular (LV) remodeling, mitral annular calcification (MAC), and aortic valve sclerosis (with or without stenosis) were highly prevalent in the LOOP study (40%, 39%, and 27%, respectively). Moreover, a high prevalence of functional cardiac alterations such as LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), abnormal LV longitudinal systolic strain (GLS), and abnormal left atrial (LA) reservoir strain was present in the LOOP study (27%, 18%, and 9%, respectively). Likewise, the rate of LVDD, abnormal GLS, and abnormal LA reservoir strain was comparable in the validation sample from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. In line with these findings, subjects with LV remodeling, MAC, and aortic valve changes had a higher prevalence of LVDD, abnormal GLS, and abnormal LA reservoir strain than those without structural cardiac alterations.

conclusionThe findings of this study highlight the potential clinical utility of conventional and speckle-tracking echocardiography in the screening of structural and functional cardiac abnormalities in the elderly population. Further studies are warranted to determine the prognostic relevance of these findings.

Indexed as

CalcinosisHeart Defects, CongenitalVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAgedEchocardiographyHeart AtriaHumansVentricular Function, LeftVentricular Remodeling

Identifiers

PMID35658048
PMCPMC9165786
OpenAlexW4281633692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.