Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35658028›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Detection of Fusobacterium nucleatum DNA in primary care patient stool samples does not predict progression of colorectal neoplasia.

Alan Aitchison, John F Pearson, Rachel V Purcell, Frank A Frizelle, Jacqueline I Keenan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fusobacterium nucleatum, succinate signaling, and immunotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer: clinical relevance and translational opportunities.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Quantification of EctopicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Duplex qPCR Assay Targeting theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Significance ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Association ofGut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The microbial landscape of colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan AitchisonDepartment of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
John F PearsonBiostatistics and Computational Biology Unit, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Rachel V PurcellDepartment of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Frank A FrizelleDepartment of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Jacqueline I KeenanDepartment of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3409-0337
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarriage of certain bacterial species may represent potential biomarkers of colorectal cancer (CRC). Prominent among these is Fusobacterium nucleatum. We explored the association of F. nucleatum DNA in stool samples with the presence of colonic neoplastic lesions in a cohort of primary care patients, and compared our findings with those from an unrelated cohort of colonoscopy patients followed clinically over time.

methodsCarriage rates of F. nucleatum in stool samples were assessed in 185 patients referred for a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) by their general practitioners (GPs). Comparisons were made with stool samples from 57 patients diagnosed with CRC and 57 age-matched healthy controls, and with tissue samples taken at colonoscopy from 150 patients with a decade of subsequent clinical follow-up.

findingsF. nucleatum DNA was found at a high rate (47.0%) in stool samples from primary care patients, and more often in stool samples from CRC patients (47.4%) than in healthy controls (7.0%), (P = 7.66E-7). No association was found between carriage of F. nucleatum and FIT positivity (P = 0.588). While evidence of stool-associated F. nucleatum DNA was significantly more likely to indicate a lesion in those primary care patients progressed to colonoscopy (P = 0.023), this finding did not extend to the progression of neoplastic lesions in the 150 patients with a decade of follow up.

conclusionThe finding of F. nucleatum DNA at similar rates in stool samples from patients diagnosed with CRC and in primary care patients with pre-cancerous lesions supports growing awareness that the presence of these bacteria may be a biomarker for increased risk of disease. However, molecular evidence of F. nucleatum did not predict progression of colonic lesions, which may lessen the utility of this bacterium as a biomarker for increased risk of disease.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsFusobacterium InfectionsColonoscopyFusobacterium nucleatumHumansOccult BloodPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID35658028
PMCPMC9165787
OpenAlexW4281892190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.