Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35657824›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Pneumatic equiaxial compression device for mechanical manipulation of epithelial cell packing and physiology.

Heidi Peussa, Joose Kreutzer, Elina Mäntylä, Antti-Juhana Mäki, Soile Nymark, Pasi Kallio, Teemu O Ihalainen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Light-Induced Nanoscale Deformation in Azobenzene Thin Film Triggers Rapid Intracellular CaAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heidi PeussaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6028-4901
Joose KreutzerFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Elina MäntyläFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8681-8772
Antti-Juhana MäkiFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7565-3530
Soile NymarkFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Pasi KallioFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2890-6782
Teemu O IhalainenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4351-8697
Tampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that mechanical cues, e.g., tensile- compressive- or shear forces, are important co-regulators of cell and tissue physiology. To understand the mechanistic effects these cues have on cells, technologies allowing precise mechanical manipulation of the studied cells are required. As the significance of cell density i.e., packing on cellular behavior is beginning to unravel, we sought to design an equiaxial cell compression device based on our previously published cell stretching system. We focused on improving the suitability for microscopy and the user-friendliness of the system. By introducing a hinge structure to the substrate stretch generating vacuum chamber, we managed to decrease the z-displacement of the cell culture substrate, thus reducing the focal plane drift. The vacuum battery, the mini-incubator, as well as the custom-made vacuum pressure controller make the experimental setup more flexible and portable. Furthermore, we improved the efficiency and repeatability of manufacture of the device by designing a mold that can be used to cast the body of the device. We also compared several different silicone membranes, and chose SILPURAN® due to its best microscopy imaging properties. Here, we show that the device can produce a maximum 8.5% radial pre-strain which leads to a 15% equiaxial areal compression as the pre-strain is released. When tested with epithelial cells, upon compression, we saw a decrease in cell cross-sectional area and an increase in cell layer height. Additionally, before compression the cells had two distinct cell populations with different cross-sectional areas that merged into a more uniform population due to compression. In addition to these morphological changes, we detected an alteration in the nucleo-cytoplasmic distribution of YAP1, suggesting that the cellular packing is enough to induce mechanical signaling in the epithelium.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesEpithelial CellsMechanotransduction, CellularStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID35657824
PMCPMC9165817
OpenAlexW4281681604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.