Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35657664›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Extracting Multiple Worries From Breast Cancer Patient Blogs Using Multilabel Classification With the Natural Language Processing Model Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers: Infodemiology Study of Blogs.

Tomomi Watanabe, Shuntaro Yada, Eiji Aramaki, Hiroshi Yajima, Hayato Kizaki, Satoko Hori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. User profiles of young breast cancer survivors on Chinese social media: machine learning-based text mining analysis study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomomi WatanabeDivision of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5147-6779
Shuntaro YadaNara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6209-1054
Eiji AramakiNara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0201-3609
Hiroshi YajimaMediaid Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0251-9730
Hayato KizakiDivision of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4572-1333
Satoko HoriDivision of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4596-5418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with breast cancer have a variety of worries and need multifaceted information support. Their accumulated posts on social media contain rich descriptions of their daily worries concerning issues such as treatment, family, and finances. It is important to identify these issues to help patients with breast cancer to resolve their worries and obtain reliable information.

objectiveThis study aimed to extract and classify multiple worries from text generated by patients with breast cancer using Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers (BERT), a context-aware natural language processing model.

methodsA total of 2272 blog posts by patients with breast cancer in Japan were collected. Five worry labels, "treatment," "physical," "psychological," "work/financial," and "family/friends," were defined and assigned to each post. Multiple labels were allowed. To assess the label criteria, 50 blog posts were randomly selected and annotated by two researchers with medical knowledge. After the interannotator agreement had been assessed by means of Cohen kappa, one researcher annotated all the blogs. A multilabel classifier that simultaneously predicts five worries in a text was developed using BERT. This classifier was fine-tuned by using the posts as input and adding a classification layer to the pretrained BERT. The performance was evaluated for precision using the average of 5-fold cross-validation results.

resultsAmong the blog posts, 477 included "treatment," 1138 included "physical," 673 included "psychological," 312 included "work/financial," and 283 included "family/friends." The interannotator agreement values were 0.67 for "treatment," 0.76 for "physical," 0.56 for "psychological," 0.73 for "work/financial," and 0.73 for "family/friends," indicating a high degree of agreement. Among all blog posts, 544 contained no label, 892 contained one label, and 836 contained multiple labels. It was found that the worries varied from user to user, and the worries posted by the same user changed over time. The model performed well, though prediction performance differed for each label. The values of precision were 0.59 for "treatment," 0.82 for "physical," 0.64 for "psychological," 0.67 for "work/financial," and 0.58 for "family/friends." The higher the interannotator agreement and the greater the number of posts, the higher the precision tended to be.

conclusionsThis study showed that the BERT model can extract multiple worries from text generated from patients with breast cancer. This is the first application of a multilabel classifier using the BERT model to extract multiple worries from patient-generated text. The results will be helpful to identify breast cancer patients' worries and give them timely social support.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceBERT modelblog postbreast cancerbreast neoplasmcancercontent analysismachine learningmodelnatural language processingNLPoncologypatient datapeer supportquality of lifesentiment analysissocial mediasocial supporttext mining

Identifiers

PMID35657664
PMCPMC9206207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.