Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35657639›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

Genomic consequences of artificial selection during early domestication of a wood fibre crop.

Marja M Mostert-O'Neill, Hannah Tate, S Melissa Reynolds, Makobatjatji M Mphahlele, Gert van den Berg, Steve D Verryn, Juan J Acosta, Justin O Borevitz, Alexander A Myburg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Marja M Mostert-O'NeillDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6318-3508
Hannah TateDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8698-5183
S Melissa ReynoldsDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8995-5836
Makobatjatji M MphahleleDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2563-7764
Gert van den BergSappi Forests Research, Shaw Research Centre, PO Box 473, Howick, 3290, South Africa.
Steve D VerrynCreation Breeding Innovations, 75 Kafue St., Lynnwood Glen, 0081, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8026-0707
Juan J AcostaCamcore, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, PO Box 7626, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9429-5166
Justin O BorevitzResearch School of Biology and Centre for Biodiversity Analysis, ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-3699
Alexander A MyburgDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Pretoria, 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0644-5003
University of Pretoria · ZAAustralian National University · AUHealth Innovations (United States) · USNorth Carolina State University · USSappi (South Africa) · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From its origins in Australia, Eucalyptus grandis has spread to every continent, except Antarctica, as a wood crop. It has been cultivated and bred for over 100 yr in places such as South Africa. Unlike most annual crops and fruit trees, domestication of E. grandis is still in its infancy, representing a unique opportunity to interrogate the genomic consequences of artificial selection early in the domestication process. To determine how a century of artificial selection has changed the genome of E. grandis, we generated single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes for 1080 individuals from three advanced South African breeding programmes using the EUChip60K chip, and investigated population structure and genome-wide differentiation patterns relative to wild progenitors. Breeding and wild populations appeared genetically distinct. We found genomic evidence of evolutionary processes known to have occurred in other plant domesticates, including interspecific introgression and intraspecific infusion from wild material. Furthermore, we found genomic regions with increased linkage disequilibrium and genetic differentiation, putatively representing early soft sweeps of selection. This is, to our knowledge, the first study of genomic signatures of domestication in a timber species looking beyond the first few generations of cultivation. Our findings highlight the importance of intra- and interspecific hybridization during early domestication.

Indexed as

DomesticationGenome, PlantGenomicsPlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticWoodartificial selectiondomesticationeucalyptforestrypopulation genomicsselection signatures

Identifiers

PMID35657639
PMCPMC9541791
OpenAlexW4281935773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.