Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35657627›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Effect of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine on Delayed Graft Function Following a Donation-After-Cardiac-Death Kidney Transplant: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Xi-Sheng Shan, Lin-Kun Hu, Yiqing Wang, Hua-Yue Liu, Jun Chen, Xiao-Wen Meng, Jin-Xian Pu, Yu-Hua Huang, Jian-Quan Hou, Xiao-Mei Feng and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xi-Sheng ShanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Lin-Kun HuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yiqing WangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Hua-Yue LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jun ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xiao-Wen MengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jin-Xian PuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Yu-Hua HuangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jian-Quan HouDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xiao-Mei FengDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City.
Hong LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento.
Lingzhong MengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ke PengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Fu-Hai JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Soochow University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNUniversity of Utah · USZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a risk factor for acute rejection and graft failure after kidney transplant. Previous studies have suggested that dexmedetomidine may be renoprotective, but whether the use of dexmedetomidine would improve kidney allograft function is unknown. Objective: To investigate the effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine on DGF following a donation-after-cardiac-death (DCD) kidney transplant. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in Suzhou, China. Adults (18 years or older) who were scheduled for DCD kidney transplant were enrolled between September 1, 2019, and January 28, 2021, and then randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine or normal saline (placebo). One-year postoperative outcomes were recorded. All analyses were based on the modified intention-to-treat population. Interventions: Patients who were randomized to the dexmedetomidine group received a 24-hour perioperative dexmedetomidine intravenous infusion (0.4 μg/kg/h intraoperatively and 0.1 μg/kg/h postoperatively). Patients who were randomized to the normal saline group received an intravenous infusion of the placebo with the same dose regimen as the dexmedetomidine. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of DGF, defined as the need for dialysis in the first posttransplant week. The prespecified secondary outcomes were in-hospital repeated dialysis in the first posttransplant week, in-hospital acute rejection, and serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, estimated glomerular filtration rate, need for dialysis, and patient survival on posttransplant day 30. Results: Of the 114 patients enrolled, 111 completed the study (mean [SD] age, 43.4 [10.8] years; 64 male patients [57.7%]), of whom 56 were randomized to the dexmedetomidine group and 55 to the normal saline group. Dexmedetomidine infusion compared with normal saline reduced the incidence of DGF (17.9% vs 34.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.98; P = .04) and repeated dialysis (12.5% vs 30.9%; OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.88; P = .02, which was not statistically significant after multiple testing corrections), without significant effect on other secondary outcomes. Dexmedetomidine vs normal saline infusion led to a higher median (IQR) creatinine clearance rate on postoperative days 1 (9.9 [4.9-21.2] mL/min vs 7.9 [2.0-10.4] mL/min) and 2 (29.6 [9.7-67.4] mL/min vs 14.6 [3.8-45.1] mL/min) as well as increased median (IQR) urine output on postoperative days 2 (106.5 [66.3-175.6] mL/h vs 82.9 [27.1-141.9] mL/h) and 7 (126.1 [98.0-151.3] mL/h vs 107.0 [82.5-137.5] mL/h) and at hospital discharge discharge (110.4 [92.8-121.9] mL/h vs 97.1 [77.5-113.8] mL/h). Three patients (5.5%) from the normal saline group developed allograft failure by the post hoc 1-year follow-up visit. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that 24-hour perioperative dexmedetomidine decreased the incidence of DGF after DCD kidney transplant. The findings support the use of dexmedetomidine in kidney transplants. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1900025493.

Indexed as

DexmedetomidineKidney TransplantationAdultDeathDelayed Graft FunctionHumansMaleRenal DialysisSaline SolutionDexmedetomidineSaline Solution

Identifiers

PMID35657627
PMCPMC9166619
OpenAlexW4281868031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.