Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35657580›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2022

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Prolonged Infusions of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: An Observational Study.

María Eugenia Navarrete-Rouco, Sònia Luque, Luisa Sorlí, Adela Benítez-Cano, Jason A Roberts, Santiago Grau

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

María Eugenia Navarrete-Rouco *Pharmacy Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Sònia Luque *Pharmacy Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain. sluque@psmar.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3215-320X
Luisa SorlíInfectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Adela Benítez-CanoInfectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Jason A RobertsUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Santiago GrauPharmacy Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Parc de Salut · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveProlonged infusion of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a strategy used to increase achievement of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for the treatment of multi- or extensively drug-resistant MDR/XDR Gram-negative microorganisms. The objective of this study was to describe our therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) experience of C/T administered by prolonged infusion or intermittent infusion to patients with MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Our outcomes of interest were pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target achievement and clinical cure.

methodsPatients with MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa infections treated with C/T were enrolled between February 2018 and February 2020. Blood samples were obtained as part of a TDM program. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic therapeutic target of C/T was defined as 100% of the duration of the dosing interval that free concentrations are above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (100 %ƒT ≥ MIC) of the causative pathogen. Dose changes were performed according to TDM results.

resultsForty patients were included: 13 (32.5%) with a proven MDR and 27 (67.5%) with a XDR P. aeruginosa infection. C/T was administered by prolonged infusion in 32 (80%) patients and by intermittent infusion in 8 (20%) patients. Lower doses were administered in the prolonged infusion compared to the intermittent infusion group [3 (9.4%) vs. 5 (62.5%] patients received a dose of 9 g/day (ceftolozane 2 g + tazobactam 1 g, every 8 h; p = 0.004). All patients achieved the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target and C/T concentrations exceeded 10 × MIC in > 50% of patients in both groups. TDM-recommended dose reductions occurred in 19 (47.5%) patients, being 16 (84.2%) in the prolonged infusion group. A high proportion of patients achieved clinical cure (82.5%).

conclusionsThe administration of C/T by prolonged infusion with TDM-guided dosing allowed the achievement of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target even at lower doses. C/T showed a high efficacy for treating MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa infections.

Indexed as

Pseudomonas InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsDrug MonitoringHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaTazobactamAnti-Bacterial AgentsceftolozaneCephalosporinsTazobactam

Identifiers

PMID35657580
OpenAlexW4281657265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.