ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2022
Recurrence and complications after sliding inguinal hernia repair.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in the etiology of inguinal hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Transabdominal pre-peritoneal hernia repair: risk of operation for recurrence depends on choice of both mesh and fixation device. A study from the Danish Hernia Database.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Sliding Inguinal Bladder Hernia: An Open and Minimally Invasive Robotic-Assisted Repair.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSliding hernia is a rare finding and it remains controversial if a laparoscopic or an open (Lichenstein) technique is preferable for repair of sliding hernias. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of post-operative complications and risk of reoperation due to recurrence in patients with sliding hernia based on surgical technique.
methodThe study included male patients receiving hernia repair between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017. The data was obtained from the National Danish Hernia Database.
resultsA total of 32,396 hernia repairs were included. 13.5% presented with sliding hernia. No difference was found in postoperative complications comparing sliding and non-sliding lateral hernias (5.1% vs 4.2% at 90 days of follow up). Patients treated with a Lichenstein repair had a higher risk of minor complications compared to a laparoscopic repair, however the risk was overall low (1.9% vs 0.8%). Overall 3.1% had surgical repair of recurrence, a higher risk was found among patients with sliding hernia (4.3% vs 2.9%), particularly among those having a Lichenstein repair (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.11-3.85).
conclusionA low risk of complications and recurrence after repair of both sliding and non-sliding hernia was found. Among patients with sliding hernia the risk of recurrence was lower in patient having hernia repair using laparoscopic technique although in both groups the risk was low. Sliding hernias can be treated safely using both Lichenstein and laparoscopic techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.