Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35657440›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2022

Impact of active and latent concerns about COVID-19 on attention.

Caitlin A Sisk, Yi Ni Toh, Jihyang Jun, Roger W Remington, Vanessa G Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caitlin A Sisk *Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, S504 Elliott Hall, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. siskx024@umn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3868-9232
Yi Ni Toh *Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, S504 Elliott Hall, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. tohxx011@umn.edu.
Jihyang JunDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, S504 Elliott Hall, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Roger W RemingtonDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, S504 Elliott Hall, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Vanessa G LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, S504 Elliott Hall, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interactions between emotion and attention are complex due to the multifaceted nature of attention. Adding to this complexity, the COVID-19 pandemic has altered the emotional landscape, broadly heightening health and financial concerns. Can the heightened concerns about COVID-19 impair one or more of the components of attention? To explore the connection between heightened concerns about COVID-19 and attention, in a preregistered study, we collected survey responses from 234 participants assessing levels of concerns surrounding COVID-19, followed by four psychophysics tasks hypothesized to tap into different aspects of attention: visual search, working memory, sustained attention, and cognitive control. We also measured task-unrelated thoughts. Results showed that task-unrelated thoughts, but not survey reports of concern levels, negatively correlated with sustained attention and cognitive control, while visual search and working memory remained robust to task-unrelated thoughts and survey-indicated concern levels. As a whole, these findings suggest that being concerned about COVID-19 does not interfere with cognitive function unless the concerns are active in the form of task-unrelated thoughts.

Indexed as

COVID-19AttentionCognitionHumansMemory, Short-TermPandemicsCOVID-19EmotionMental healthSelective attentionSustained attention

Identifiers

PMID35657440
PMCPMC9164188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.