ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2022
[The role of health promoting schools for increasing health equity].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring meso- and macro-level contextual factors associated with inequalities in program adoption during statewide scale-up of TransformUs Primary, a whole-school physical activity intervention.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Article
- [Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of health promotion in daycare centers and elementary schools based on four selected projects].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Socioeconomic health inequalities are a major field of action in public health and tackling them is one of its main goals. However, there has been little success in reducing these health inequalities. This points to a large research deficit. Inequalities in health are already evident in childhood and adolescence, showing that those with a low socioeconomic background have more risk factors and at the same time fewer resources than their socially more privileged peers. Although health promotion aims at achieving equity in health, interventions rarely consider the socioeconomic status and can therefore provide only little evidence regarding socioeconomically differentiated intervention effects. How can we ensure that all children and young people have equal chances to grow up healthy?In order to come closer to answering this question, it is the aim of this article to give an overview of health inequalities in childhood and adolescence and to highlight the contribution of school and school-based health promotion interventions for tackling health inequalities and increasing equity in health. School is not only a place where adolescents can always be reached, regardless of their socioeconomic background, it has the potential to both exacerbate and reduce health inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.