Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35657280›Full record

ArticleStress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress2023

Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale (pss-10) with breast cancer patients.

Lorena M Soria-Reyes, M Victoria Cerezo, Rafael Alarcón, María J Blanca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sleep quality and lymphedema in breast cancer survivors: a mixed method analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorena M Soria-ReyesFaculty of Psychology, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-7239
M Victoria CerezoFaculty of Psychology, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-8536
Rafael AlarcónFaculty of Psychology, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2122-1374
María J BlancaFaculty of Psychology, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4046-9308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer diagnosis is one of the most difficult events that a woman can experience during her life and it usually produces high levels of stress. Global measures of perceived stress are useful for screening and for comparing stress levels between cancer patients and other clinical and nonclinical populations. One such instrument that is widely used is the Perceived Stress Scale (pss-10), but its psychometric properties have scarcely been analysed with breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to provide validity evidence regarding the use of the 10-item version of the pss-10 as a tool for measuring perceived stress in this context. Participants were 215 Spanish breast cancer patients who completed the PSS-10 and the DASS-21, a measure of affective distress (depression, anxiety, and stress). The internal structure of the PSS-10 was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and the reliability of test scores was estimated using McDonald's omega coefficient. Validity evidence based on relationships with other variables was also obtained using correlation analysis. The CFA supported a correlated two-factor structure: perceived helplessness (six negatively worded items) and perceived self-efficacy (four positively worded items). Reliability coefficients for scores on these two factors were 0.87 and 0.73, respectively. Scores on affective distress (DASS-21) were strongly and positively correlated with perceived helplessness and moderately and negatively correlated with perceived self-efficacy. The PSS-10 is an adequate tool for measuring perceived stress in the breast cancer context and it may be useful for identifying women at risk of psychological maladjustment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnairescancerdistresshelplessnessself-efficacyvalidity evidence

Identifiers

PMID35657280
PMCPMC10084090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.