Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35657203›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology2022

Biosimilar Rituximab (Redditux) Added to CHOP Chemotherapy for De Novo Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients: Real-Life Single-Center Experience

Murat Özbalak, Metban Güzel Mastanzade, Özden Özlük, Tarık Onur Tiryaki, Simge Erdem, Ezgi Pınar Özbalak, Tuğrul Elverdi, İpek Yönal Hindilerden, Ali Yılmaz Altay, Gülçin Yeğen and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Murat Özbalakİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-3040-4052
Metban Güzel Mastanzadeİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-2281-5978
Özden Özlükİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3667-3496
Tarık Onur Tiryakiİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0096-5684
Simge Erdemİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-8095-5445
Ezgi Pınar Özbalakİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1722-8602
Tuğrul Elverdiİstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9496-5353
İpek Yönal Hindilerdenİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-3020-850X
Ali Yılmaz Altayİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Pathology, Division of Hematopathology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-4678-2047
Gülçin Yeğenİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Pathology, Division of Hematopathology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-2497-219X
Ahmet Emre Eşkazanİstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-9568-0894
Muhlis Cem Arİstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0332-9253
Mustafa Nuri Yenerelİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-6473-1342
Teoman Soysalİstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7417-2118
Meliha Nalçacıİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-2555-5024
Burhan FerhanoğluV.K.V. American Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4257-549X
Sevgi Kalayoğlu Beşışıkİstanbul University, İstanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, İstanbul, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-9310-1278
Istanbul University · TRIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRAmerikan Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Redditux Materials and Methods: Fifty-one patients received RED combined with the CHOP regimen. The median follow-up was 31 months. The historical control group included 219 patients treated with the MAB-CHOP regimen and the median follow-up time was 38 months. We compared the response rates and survival outcomes of these RED-CHOP and MAB-CHOP cohorts. Results: In the RED cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) at the end of the treatment protocol was 86%, with 37 (72.5%) cases of complete response (CR) and 7 (13.5%) cases of partial response (PR). In the historical MAB cohort, the ORR was 84%, with CR and PR rates of 82% and 2%, respectively. The 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 73.76% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.84) and 85.2% (95% CI: 0.79-0.90) for the RED and MAB cohorts, respectively (p=0.0106). The 24-month overall survival rates were 78.4% (95% CI: 0.64-0.87) and 81.4% (95% CI: 0.75-0.86) for the RED and MAB cohorts, respectively (p=0.7461). For patients with high revised International Prognostic Index scores, 24-month PFS was 45.5% (95% CI: 0.17-0.71) and 63% (95% CI: 0.37-0.80) for the RED and MAB cohorts, respectively (p=0.0711). In the RED cohort, central nervous system (CNS) relapse was significantly increased compared to the MAB cohort (10% vs. 1.83%, p=0.004). Among the RED cohort, bone involvement at the time of diagnosis was a risk factor for CNS relapse (p=0.028). Thirteen patients died in follow-up. There were no serious adverse events causing the cessation of the drugs. Conclusion: RED has an ORR similar to that of MAB. However, PFS rates were worse in the RED cohort. Additionally, CNS relapse ratio was a major concern for our RED cohort. Large prospective controlled studies and real-life data with longer follow-up are needed to document the non-inferiority of RED compared to MAB.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrednisoneProspective StudiesRituximabVincristineAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinPrednisoneRituximabVincristineBiosimilarDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaNon-Hodgkin lymphomaReddituxRituximab

Identifiers

PMID35657203
PMCPMC9727716
OpenAlexW4281619539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.