Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656997›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2022

Population Pharmacokinetics of Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate in Healthcare Workers, Given for Prophylaxis Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in India.

Jeffrey Pradeep Raj, Nithya Jaideep Gogtay, Avaneesh Pandey, Ashish Kumar Kakkar, Nusrat Shafiq, Padmaja Mekala, Usharani Pingali, Arun Prasath Raju, Surulivelrajan Mallayasamy, Nilima Arun Kshirsagar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey Pradeep RajDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth, GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8621-6106
Nithya Jaideep GogtayDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth, GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8167-7125
Avaneesh PandeyDepartment of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8035-1713
Ashish Kumar KakkarDepartment of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-7304
Nusrat ShafiqDepartment of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Padmaja MekalaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Usharani PingaliDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Arun Prasath RajuDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4723-8748
Surulivelrajan MallayasamyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-5096
Nilima Arun KshirsagarNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9195-3143
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INKing Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · INNizam's Institute of Medical Sciences · INNational Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) and frontline workers were recommended hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 400 mg twice a day on day 1, followed by 400 mg once weekly for the next 7 weeks, as prophylaxis against COVID-19. There was limited information on the population pharmacokinetics (popPK) of HCQ in an Indian setting when administered for prophylaxis against COVID-19, and hence this study was proposed. It was a multicentric prospective study conducted at 3 sites in India wherein HCWs who were already on HCQ prophylaxis, who were about to start prophylaxis or who had stopped the prophylaxis for any reason were enrolled. Each participant gave 2 to 6 blood samples at different time points and whole-blood HCQ concentrations were assayed using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS). popPK analysis was performed using PUMAS 1.1.0. A total of N = 338 blood samples from N = 121 participants were included in the popPK analysis. A 2-compartment structural model with linear elimination was able to explain the observed data. Body weight was found to be a significant covariate influencing drug clearance. The final model was assessed using goodness-of-fit plots, a visual predictive check and a bootstrap, all of which confirmed that the model was appropriate. Simulations based on the current regimen showed that trough values were below the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 0.7 μmol against COVID-19. A new weight-based dosage regimen was proposed to maintain the trough concentration above the EC50 threshold.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHydroxychloroquineHealth PersonnelHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Tandem Mass SpectrometryHydroxychloroquineCOVID-19hydroxychloroquine sulfatepharmacometricspopulation pharmacokineticsprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID35656997
PMCPMC9347612
OpenAlexW4281785415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.