ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2022
Sparse group selection and analysis of function-related residue for protein-state recognition.
Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of Anomaly Detection to Identify Important Features of Protein Dynamics.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning methods have helped to advance wide range of scientific and technological field in recent years, including computational chemistry. As the chemical systems could become complex with high dimension, feature selection could be critical but challenging to develop reliable machine learning based prediction models, especially for proteins as bio-macromolecules. In this study, we applied sparse group lasso (SGL) method as a general feature selection method to develop classification model for an allosteric protein in different functional states. This results into a much improved model with comparable accuracy (Acc) and only 28 selected features comparing to 289 selected features from a previous study. The Acc achieves 91.50% with 1936 selected feature, which is far higher than that of baseline methods. In addition, grouping protein amino acids into secondary structures provides additional interpretability of the selected features. The selected features are verified as associated with key allosteric residues through comparison with both experimental and computational works about the model protein, and demonstrate the effectiveness and necessity of applying rigorous feature selection and evaluation methods on complex chemical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.