Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656854›Full record

ReviewFamily practice2022

Clinical decision support methods for children and youths with mental health disorders in primary care.

Lennard T van Venrooij, Vlad Rusu, Robert R J M Vermeiren, Roman A Koposov, Norbert Skokauskas, Matty R Crone

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Family practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lennard T van VenrooijDepartment of Research and Education, Academic Center for Child and Youth Psychiatry, Curium-LUMC, Oegstgeest, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7413-5229
Vlad RusuDepartment of Research and Education, Academic Center for Child and Youth Psychiatry, Curium-LUMC, Oegstgeest, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7088-6503
Robert R J M VermeirenDepartment of Research and Education, Academic Center for Child and Youth Psychiatry, Curium-LUMC, Oegstgeest, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-2207
Roman A KoposovRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, Northern Norway, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7393-2920
Norbert SkokauskasRegional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare, IPH, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9352-3489
Matty R CroneDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1243-858X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health disorders among children and youths are common and often have negative consequences for children, youths, and families if unrecognized and untreated. With the goal of early recognition, primary care physicians (PCPs) play a significant role in the detection and referral of mental disorders. However, PCPs report several barriers related to confidence, knowledge, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Therefore, initiatives have been taken to assist PCPs in their clinical decision-making through clinical decision support methods (CDSMs).

objectivesThis review aimed to identify CDSMs in the literature and describe their functionalities and quality.

methodsIn this review, a search strategy was performed to access all available studies in PubMed, PsychINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and COCHRANE using keywords. Studies that involved CDSMs for PCP clinical decision-making regarding psychosocial or psychiatric problems among children and youths (0-24 years old) were included. The search was conducted according to PRISMA-Protocols.

resultsOf 1,294 studies identified, 25 were eligible for inclusion and varied in quality. Eighteen CDSMs were described. Fourteen studies described computer-based methods with decision support, focusing on self-help, probable diagnosis, and treatment suggestions. Nine studies described telecommunication methods, which offered support through interdisciplinary (video) calls. Two studies described CDSMs with a combination of components related to the two CDSM categories.

conclusionEasy-to-use CDSMs of good quality are valuable for advising PCPs on the detection and referral of children and youths with mental health disorders. However, valid multicentre research on a combination of computer-based methods and telecommunication is still needed.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMental DisordersAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMental HealthPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationYoung Adultaccess to careadolescentchildren and youthsfamily healthmental healthprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35656854
PMCPMC9680662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.