Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656789›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2022

Constant Pressure Convection-Enhanced Delivery Increases Volume Dispersed With Catheter Movement in Agarose.

Jason N Mehta, Brianna E Morales, Fang-Chi Hsu, John H Rossmeisl, Christopher G Rylander

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jason N MehtaWalker Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 204 E. Dean Keeton Street, Stop C2200, Austin, TX, 78712-1591.
Brianna E MoralesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 301 E. Dean Keeton St. C2100, Austin, TX, 78712-2100.
Fang-Chi HsuDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine Medical, Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157.
John H RossmeislDepartment of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, VA-MD College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, 205 Duckpond Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Christopher G RylanderWalker Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 204 E. Dean Keeton Street, Stop C2200, Austin, TX, 78712-1591.
The University of Texas at Austin · USVirginia Tech · USWake Forest University · USWalker (United States) · US

Funding

Sub-component for Institution # 16-01848 Novel moleculary targeted therapy of GBMP01CA207206 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBINSKI, WALDEMAR · 2017 to 2021
$9.0M
Multi-receptor Targeting of GlioblastomaR01CA256285 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Waldemar Debinski · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
Comprehensive Training Program in Imaging Science and InformaticsT32EB007507 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARKEY, MIA K, RYLANDER, HENRY GRADY · 2009 to 2024
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA207206NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256285NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has been extensively studied for drug delivery to the brain due to its inherent ability to bypass the blood-brain barrier. Unfortunately, CED has also been shown to inadequately distribute therapeutic agents over a large enough targeted tissue volume to be clinically beneficial. In this study, we explore the use of constant pressure infusions in addition to controlled catheter movement as a means to increase volume dispersed (Vd) in an agarose gel brain tissue phantom. Constant flow rate and constant pressure infusions were conducted with a stationary catheter, a catheter retracting at a rate of 0.25 mm/min, and a catheter retracting at a rate of 0.5 mm/min. The 0.25 mm/min and 0.5 mm/min retracting constant pressure catheters resulted in significantly larger Vd compared to any other group, with a 105% increase and a 155% increase compared to the stationary constant flow rate catheter, respectively. These same constant pressure retracting infusions resulted in a 42% and 45% increase in Vd compared to their constant flow rate counterparts. Using constant pressure infusions coupled with controlled catheter movement appears to have a beneficial effect on Vd in agarose gel. Furthermore, constant pressure infusions reveal the fundamental limitation of flow-driven infusions in both controlled catheter movement protocols as well as in stationary protocols where maximum infusion volume can never be reliably obtained.

Indexed as

CathetersConvectionBrainDrug Delivery SystemsSepharoseSepharoseagarose gelconstant pressure infusioncontrolled catheter movementconvection-enhanced deliverydrug deliveryglioblastomavolume dispersed

Identifiers

PMID35656789
PMCPMC9254693
OpenAlexW4282037722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.