ReviewClinical endoscopy2022
Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diagnostic Performance of Linked Color Imaging Compared to White Light Imaging in Endoscopic Diagnosis ofGut and liver · 2024Pooled it
- Operation sequence of bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia affected colonoscopy performance: a randomized controlled trial.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Exploratory Analysis of Quality Indicators for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy During Surveillance Following Gastric Endoscopic Scubmucosal Dissection.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Observational
- Time as a marker of quality in diagnostic upper endoscopy: a retrospective study of its association with clinically significant findings.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Seeing more by looking longer: the value of time in diagnostic upper endoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance and Potential Harms of Population-Based Esophagogastroduodenoscopy for Gastric Cancer Screening.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- A Video-Based Artificial Intelligence Platform for Measuring Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Duration and Suggesting Real-Time Landmark Documentation.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Advancing Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Detection: A Single-Center Pilot Study Exploring the Potential of Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Endoscopic Procedures.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with organic dyspepsia in older adults with dyspepsia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Endoscopists and endoscopic assistants' qualifications, but not their biopsy rates, improve gastric precancerous lesions detection rate.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Review
- GastroHUN an Endoscopy Dataset of Complete Systematic Screening Protocol for the Stomach.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric High-Grade Foveolar Dysplasia With Normal Background Mucosa.Gastro hep advances · 2025Article
- Review
- Simethicone and N-acetyl cysteine in improving mucosal visibility: Towards a "clearer view" during endoscopy.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Optimal Surveillance of Metachronous Gastric Lesion after Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer.Gut and liver · 2024Review
- Chronic Atrophic Gastritis and Intestinal Metaplasia: A Latin American Perspective.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2024Review
- Optimal number of images and 2-year interval affect cancer detection in screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy: An observational study.Medicine · 2024Observational
- The Effect of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy on Intraocular Pressure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Relationship between observation time and detection rate of focal lesions in Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a single-center, retrospective study.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) has been used to diagnose a wide variety of upper gastrointestinal diseases. In particular, EGD is used to screen high-risk subjects of gastric cancer. Quality control of EGD is important because the diagnostic rate is examiner-dependent. However, there is still no representative quality indicator that can be uniformly applied in EGD. There has been growing awareness of the importance of quality control in improving EGD performance. Therefore, we aimed to review the available and emerging quality indicators for diagnostic EGD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.