Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656515›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2022

Medical Image Segmentation Using Transformer Networks.

Davood Karimi, Haoran Dou, Ali Gholipour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An approach to building foundation models for brain image analysis.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Davood KarimiDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5155-2644
Haoran DouCentre for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.
Ali GholipourDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7699-4564

Funding

Next-generation in-vivo fetal neuroimagingR01EB031849 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GHOLIPOUR-BABOLI, ALI · 2021 to 2024
$2.2M
Enhanced Imaging of the Fetal Brain MicrostructureR01EB032366 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GHOLIPOUR-BABOLI, ALI · 2022 to 2025
$2.0M
Acquisition of a Siemens 3T MRI for Research ImagingS10OD025111 · OD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WARFIELD, SIMON K · 2018 to 2018
$2.0M
Advancing Microstructural and Vascular Neuroimaging in Perinatal StrokeR01NS106030 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WARFIELD, SIMON K · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031849NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032366NIH HHS S10 OD025111NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning models represent the state of the art in medical image segmentation. Most of these models are fully-convolutional networks (FCNs), namely each layer processes the output of the preceding layer with convolution operations. The convolution operation enjoys several important properties such as sparse interactions, parameter sharing, and translation equivariance. Because of these properties, FCNs possess a strong and useful inductive bias for image modeling and analysis. However, they also have certain important shortcomings, such as performing a fixed and pre-determined operation on a test image regardless of its content and difficulty in modeling long-range interactions. In this work we show that a different deep neural network architecture, based entirely on self-attention between neighboring image patches and without any convolution operations, can achieve more accurate segmentations than FCNs. Our proposed model is based directly on the transformer network architecture. Given a 3D image block, our network divides it into non-overlapping 3D patches and computes a 1D embedding for each patch. The network predicts the segmentation map for the block based on the self-attention between these patch embeddings. Furthermore, in order to address the common problem of scarcity of labeled medical images, we propose methods for pre-training this model on large corpora of unlabeled images. Our experiments show that the proposed model can achieve segmentation accuracies that are better than several state of the art FCN architectures on two datasets. Our proposed network can be trained using only tens of labeled images. Moreover, with the proposed pre-training strategies, our network outperforms FCNs when labeled training data is small.

Indexed as

Deep learningmedical image segmentationself-attentiontransformer networks

Identifiers

PMID35656515
PMCPMC9159704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.