Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656507›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Early-Stage Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Different Tumor Diameters: Small Tumors Have a Better Prognosis.

Feng Xia, Zhiyuan Huang, Qiao Zhang, Elijah Ndhlovu, Mingyu Zhang, Xiaoping Chen, Bixiang Zhang, Peng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Meta-analysis of Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival Among Resected Patients with Spontaneous Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Risk Factors of Positive Resection Margin in Hepatectomy for Resectable Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Risk Prediction and Prognosis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Feng XiaDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhiyuan HuangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qiao ZhangGuangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.
Elijah NdhlovuDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Mingyu ZhangDepartment of Digestive Medicine, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoping ChenDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Bixiang ZhangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Peng ZhuDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) is classified as T4 according to the TNM staging system with a very poor (does not achieve expected) prognosis, which has always been controversial. This study aimed at assessing the specific impact of different tumor diameters on the posttreatment prognosis of BCLC stage 0/A rHCC patients. Methods: Data from 258 patients with BCLC stage 0/A HCC treated in our center from January 2008 to December 2017 were collected, including 143 rHCC patients and 115 patients with non-ruptured HCC (nrHCC). With the help of X-tile software, we determined the cutoff value of the tumor diameter in patients with rHCC. Using 8 cm as the cutoff, we divided rHCC patients into Small-rHCC (n = 96) and Large-rHCC (n = 47) groups, compared the prognoses of the S-rHCC and L-rHCC groups, as well as the prognoses of the two groups with the nrHCC group using the Kaplan-Meier method, and screened the prognostic factors of rHCC patients using the multivariate Cox risk model. Results: The OS of the S-rHCC group was significantly higher than that of the L-rHCC group [HR = 2.41 (1.60-3.63)], and the OS of the nrHCC group was comparable to that of the S-rHCC group (P = 0.204). In patients treated with surgery only, OS and RFS were also comparable in the S-rHCC nrHCC group. Meanwhile, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and the main method of treatment were also prognostic factors for OS in patients with rHCC. Conclusions: Ruptured HCC with a relatively small diameter (≤8 cm) can also achieve the same prognosis as nrHCC patients after aggressive treatment. It is also not recommended to include all patients with rHCC in stage T4.

Indexed as

BCLC stageprognosisruptured hepatocellular carcinomaTNMtumor diameter

Identifiers

PMID35656507
PMCPMC9152538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.