Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656357›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2022

Sex-Specific Neural Networks of Cued Threat Conditioning: A Pilot Study.

Kamryn C du Plessis, Sreetama Basu, Timothy H Rumbell, Elizabeth K Lucas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hippocampal Engrams Generate Variable Behavioral Responses and Brain-Wide Network States.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. CB1R blockade unmasks TRPV1-mediated contextual fear generalization in female, but not male rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamryn C du PlessisDepartment of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Sreetama BasuDepartment of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Timothy H RumbellIBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, United States.
Elizabeth K LucasDepartment of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Funding

A sex-specific circuit for emotional memoryR01MH123768 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LUCAS, ELIZABETH KATHLEEN · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
U-TEAM: Undergraduate Interdisciplinary Training in Comparative Biomedical ResearchT34GM131947 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI PIEDRAHITA, JORGE A · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM131947NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cued threat conditioning is the most common preclinical model for emotional memory, which is dysregulated in anxiety disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder. Though women are twice as likely as men to develop these disorders, current knowledge of threat conditioning networks was established by studies that excluded female subjects. For unbiased investigation of sex differences in these networks, we quantified the neural activity marker c-fos across 112 brain regions in adult male and female mice after cued threat conditioning compared to naïve controls. We found that trained females engaged prelimbic cortex, lateral amygdala, cortical amygdala, dorsal peduncular cortex, and subparafasicular nucleus more than, and subparaventricular zone less than, trained males. To explore how these sex differences in regional activity impact the global network, we generated interregional cross-correlations of c-fos expression to identify regions that were co-active during conditioning and performed hub analyses to identify regional control centers within each neural network. These exploratory graph theory-derived analyses revealed sex differences in the functional coordination of the threat conditioning network as well as distinct hub regions between trained males and females. Hub identification across multiple networks constructed by sequentially pruning the least reliable connections revealed globus pallidus and ventral lateral septum as the most robust hubs for trained males and females, respectively. While low sample size and lack of non-associative controls are major limitations, these findings provide preliminary evidence of sex differences in the individual circuit components and broader global networks of threat conditioning that may confer female vulnerability to fear-based psychiatric disease.

Indexed as

associative memoryclassical conditioningfear conditioningfunctional connectivitygraph theoryimmediate early genememory encodingnegative valence systems

Identifiers

PMID35656357
PMCPMC9152023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.