Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656356›Full record

ArticleComputational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)2021

Multi-Round Trust Game Quantifies Inter-Individual Differences in Social Exchange from Adolescence to Adulthood.

Andreas Hula, Michael Moutoussis, Geert-Jan Will, Danae Kokorikou, Andrea M Reiter, Gabriel Ziegler, NSPN Consortium, E D Bullmore, Peter B Jones, Ian Goodyer and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Decision-Making with Predictions of Others' Likely and Unlikely Choices in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Andreas HulaAustrian Insitute of Technology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-5604
Michael MoutoussisWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4751-0425
Geert-Jan WillInstitute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1887-9829
Danae KokorikouAnna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Andrea M ReiterWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Lifespan Developmental Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; Department of Neurology, Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5209-3996
Gabriel ZieglerCentre for Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6589-6416
NSPN Consortium
E D BullmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council/Wellcome Trust Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8955-8283
Peter B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0387-880X
Ian GoodyerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9183-0373
Peter FonagyAnna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-0091
P Read MontagueWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Human Neuroimaging Laboratory, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, Virginia, United States of America; Department of Physics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8967-0339
Raymond J DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9356-761X
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBNational Health Service · GBAnna Freud Centre · GBAustrian Institute of Technology · ATGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DELeiden University · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_G0802534Wellcome Trust 095844Wellcome Trust 098362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investing in strangers in a socio-economic exchange is risky, as we may be uncertain whether they will reciprocate. Nevertheless, the potential rewards for cooperating can be great. Here, we used a cross sectional sample (n = 784) to study how the challenges of cooperation versus defection are negotiated across an important period of the lifespan: from adolescence to young adulthood (ages 14 to 25). We quantified social behaviour using a multi round investor-trustee task, phenotyping individuals using a validated model whose parameters characterise patterns of real exchange and constitute latent social characteristics. We found highly significant differences in investment behaviour according to age, sex, socio-economic status and IQ. Consistent with the literature, we showed an overall trend towards higher trust from adolescence to young adulthood but, in a novel finding, we characterized key cognitive mechanisms explaining this, especially regarding socio-economic risk aversion. Males showed lower risk-aversion, associated with greater investments. We also found that inequality aversion was higher in females and, in a novel relation, that socio-economic deprivation was associated with more risk averse play.

Indexed as

AdolescentAgeDevelopmentGender DifferenceI-POMDPIQ EffectsModel BasedRisk AversionSocio-Economic StatusTrust

Identifiers

PMID35656356
PMCPMC7612797
OpenAlexW3161801203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.