Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656219›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Evaluation of Seattle's sweetened beverage tax on tax support and perceived economic and health impacts.

Vanessa M Oddo, Melissa A Knox, Lina Pinero Walkinshaw, Brian E Saelens, Nadine Chan, Jessica C Jones-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vanessa M OddoUniversity of Illinois Chicago, College of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, Chicago, IL, USA.
Melissa A KnoxUniversity of Washington, Department of Economics, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lina Pinero WalkinshawUniversity of Washington School of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian E SaelensSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nadine ChanPublic Health - Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jessica C Jones-SmithUniversity of Washington School of Public Health, Department of Health Systems and Population Health, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important to understand whether the publics' attitudes towards sugary beverage taxes (SBT) change after tax implementation to ensure the long-term success of tax policies. Seattle's SBT went into effect on January 1, 2018. We administered a mixed-mode survey to adults in Seattle and comparison areas, pre- and 2-years post-tax, to evaluate the impact of the SBT on 1) tax support and 2) perceived tax impacts (N = 2,933). Using a difference-in-differences approach, we employed adjusted income-stratified modified Poisson models to test the impacts of the tax on net changes in attitudes in Seattle versus the comparison areas, pre- to post-tax. Among lower-income individuals in Seattle, support for the tax increased by 14% (PR

Indexed as

Health policyNorms and attitudesNutrition policySSB taxesSugar sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID35656219
PMCPMC9152812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.