Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656159›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Comparison of the Fungal Community, Chemical Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Taste Characteristics of Fu Brick Tea in Different Regions of China.

Yulian Chen, Jiaxu Chen, Ruyang Chen, Leike Xiao, Xing Wu, Lin Hu, Zongjun Li, Yuanliang Wang, Mingzhi Zhu, Zhonghua Liu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Secondary Metabolites from the GenusFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yulian ChenCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Jiaxu ChenCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Ruyang ChenCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Leike XiaoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Xing WuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Lin HuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Zongjun LiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Yuanliang WangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Mingzhi ZhuKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Tea Science, College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Zhonghua LiuKey Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Tea Science, College of Horticulture, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Yu XiaoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Hunan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the fungal community structure, metabolites, antioxidant ability, and taste characteristics of five Fu brick tea (FBT) from different regions of China were determined and compared. A total of 69 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified and assigned into 5 phyla and 27 genera, with

Indexed as

antioxidant activitychemical compositionsFu brick teafungal communitytaste characteristics

Identifiers

PMID35656159
PMCPMC9152283
OpenAlexW4280602144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.