Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35656029›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

A Deep Look at the Vaginal Environment During Pregnancy and Puerperium.

Marco Severgnini, Sara Morselli, Tania Camboni, Camilla Ceccarani, Luca Laghi, Sara Zagonari, Giulia Patuelli, Maria Federica Pedna, Vittorio Sambri, Claudio Foschi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dietary habits and vaginal environment: can a beneficial impact be expected?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Anti-chlamydial activity of vaginal fluids: new evidence from anFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Role of the vaginal microbiome in miscarriage: exploring the relationship.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marco SevergniniInstitute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council, Milan, Italy.
Sara MorselliMicrobiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Tania CamboniInstitute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council, Milan, Italy.
Camilla CeccaraniInstitute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council, Milan, Italy.
Luca LaghiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy.
Sara ZagonariFamily Advisory Health Centres, Ravenna, Italy.
Giulia PatuelliFamily Advisory Health Centres, Ravenna, Italy.
Maria Federica PednaUnit of Microbiology, Greater Romagna Hub Laboratory, Cesena, Italy.
Vittorio SambriMicrobiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Claudio FoschiMicrobiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Clarissa ConsolandiInstitute of Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council, Milan, Italy.
Antonella MarangoniMicrobiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITInstitute of Biomedical Technologies · ITNational Research Council · ITOspedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A deep comprehension of the vaginal ecosystem may hold promise for unraveling the pathophysiology of pregnancy and may provide novel biomarkers to identify subjects at risk of maternal-fetal complications. In this prospective study, we assessed the characteristics of the vaginal environment in a cohort of pregnant women throughout their different gestational ages and puerperium. Both the vaginal bacterial composition and the vaginal metabolic profiles were analyzed. A total of 63 Caucasian women with a successful pregnancy and 9 subjects who had a first trimester miscarriage were enrolled. For the study, obstetric examinations were scheduled along the three trimester phases (9-13, 20-24, 32-34 gestation weeks) and puerperium (40-55 days after delivery). Two vaginal swabs were collected at each time point, to assess the vaginal microbiome profiling (by Nugent score and 16S rRNA gene sequencing) and the vaginal metabolic composition (

Indexed as

MicrobiotaVaginosis, BacterialBacteriaFemaleGardnerellaHumansLactobacillusPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPrevotellaProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SVaginaRNA, Ribosomal, 16Smiscarriagepregnancypuerperiumvaginal metabolomevaginal microbiomewomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID35656029
PMCPMC9152327
OpenAlexW4280573084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.