Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655942›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2022

Dupilumab and tezepelumab in severe refractory asthma: new opportunities.

Beatrice Ragnoli, Jaymin Morjaria, Patrizia Pignatti, Paolo Montuschi, Mariangela Barbieri, Lucrezia Mondini, Luca Ruggero, Liliana Trotta, Mario Malerba

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Structural and cellular mechanisms of mucus plugging in the larger airways.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Ferroptosis triggers airway inflammation in asthma.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatrice RagnoliRespiratory Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Vercelli, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5969-8501
Jaymin MorjariaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Harefield Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, UK.
Patrizia PignattiAllergy and Immunology Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Paolo MontuschiPharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Mariangela BarbieriRespiratory Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Vercelli, Italy.
Lucrezia MondiniRespiratory Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Vercelli, Italy.
Luca RuggeroRespiratory Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Vercelli, Italy.
Liliana TrottaRespiratory Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Vercelli, Italy.
Mario MalerbaDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy.
CTO Andrea Alesini · ITGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory condition with increasing prevalence worldwide that may present as heterogeneous phenotypes defined by the T2-mediated pattern of airway inflammation T2-high and T2-low asthma. Severe refractory asthma includes a subset of asthmatic patients who fail to control their disease despite maximal therapy and represent a group of patients needing marked resource utilization and hence may be eligible to add-on biological therapies. Among the new biologics, we focused our attention on two monoclonal antibodies: dupilumab, exerting a dual blockade of cytokine (interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13) signaling; and tezepelumab, acting at a higher level preventing the binding of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) to its receptor, thus blocking TSLP, IL-25, and IL-33 signaling, hence modulating airway T2 immune responses. With their different mechanisms of action, these two biologics represent important options to provide an enhanced personalized treatment regimen. Several clinical trials have been conducted testing the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in severe refractory asthmatic patients showing improvements in lung function, asthma control, and reducing exacerbations. Similar results were reported with tezepelumab that, differently from dupilumab, acts irrespectively on eosinophilic or non-eosinophilic phenotype. In this review, we provide an overview of the most important highlights regarding dupilumab and tezepelumab characteristics and mechanism of action with a critical review of the principal results of clinical (Phase II and III) studies concluded and those still in progress.

Indexed as

biologic therapiesdupilumabsevere refractory asthmaT2 inflammationtezepelumab

Identifiers

PMID35655942
PMCPMC9152192
OpenAlexW4285152168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.