Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655847›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Assessment of ultrasound shear wave elastography within muscles using different region of interest sizes, manufacturers, probes and acquisition angles: an

Xiuming Wang, Jiaan Zhu, Junxue Gao, Yue Hu, Yiqun Liu, Wenxue Li, Si Chen, Feifei Liu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Minimal effect of scanning parameters on ultrasound shear wave elastography variability in tendons.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiuming WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiaan ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Junxue GaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yue HuDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiqun LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wenxue LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Si ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feifei LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CNBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in assessment of the musculoskeletal system is affected by various factors. This study aimed to explore the influence of machines, probes, region of interest (ROI) sizes, and the acquisition angles on muscle shear wave speed (SWS). Methods: The SWS of Results: There was a significant difference in SWS acquired using the 3 different machines (P<0.001) or with 9 different angles (P=0.008). There was no significant difference in SWS acquired using 2 probes (P=0.053) or 4 different ROI sizes (P=0.874, 0.778, and 0.865 for 3 operators, respectively). All machines produced substantial intra-system reproducibility (ICC, 0.61-0.80). Both probes demonstrated an almost perfect degree of intra-system agreement (ICC, >0.80), and nearly all ROI sizes demonstrated an almost perfect degree of intra- and inter-operator agreement (ICC, >0.80). The measurement reliability was higher when the acquisition angles were no more than 20°. Conclusions: The 3 machines had different SWS values. Attention should be paid when comparing SWS results using different machines. For the Aixplorer system, the ROI size had no effect on the SWS values. Angles larger than 25° will lead to SWS measurements with greater variability compared to smaller angles (≤20°).

Indexed as

influencing factorsmusclesShear wave elastography (SWE)shear wave speed (SWS)ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35655847
PMCPMC9131342
OpenAlexW4282927549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.