Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655845›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Deep learning image reconstruction in pediatric abdominal and chest computed tomography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.

Kun Zhang, Xiang Shi, Shuang-Shuang Xie, Ji-Hang Sun, Zhuo-Heng Liu, Shuai Zhang, Jia-Yang Song, Wen Shen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kun ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin Institute of Imaging Medicine, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xiang ShiFirst Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Shuang-Shuang XieDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin Institute of Imaging Medicine, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Ji-Hang SunImaging Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Zhuo-Heng LiuGE Healthcare, Computed Tomography Research Center, Beijing, China.
Shuai ZhangGE Healthcare, Computed Tomography Research Center, Beijing, China.
Jia-Yang SongGE Healthcare, Computed Tomography Research Center, Beijing, China.
Wen ShenDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin Institute of Imaging Medicine, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University · CNBeijing Children’s Hospital · CNNankai University · CNTianjin First Center Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Studies on the application of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in pediatric computed tomography (CT) are limited and have so far been mostly based on phantom. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation dose of DLIR with that of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) during abdominal and chest CT for the pediatric population. Methods: A pediatric phantom was used for the pilot study, and 20 children were recruited for clinical verification. The preset scan parameter noise index (NI) was 5, 8, 11, 13, 15, and 18 for the phantom study, and 8 and 13 for the clinical pediatric study. We reconstructed CT images with ASiR-V 30%, ASiR-V 70%, DLIR-M (medium) and DLIR-H (high). The regions of interest (ROI) were marked on the organs of the abdomen (liver, kidney, and subcutaneous fat) and the chest (lung, mediastinum, and spine). The CT dose index volume (CTDI Results: In the phantom study, the interobserver assessment of the data measurement demonstrated good agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) =0.814 for abdomen, 0.801 for chest]. Within the same dose level, the N, SNR, and CNR were statistically different among reconstructions, while the CT value remained the same. The N increased and SNR decreased as the radiation dose decreased. The DLIR-H performed better than ASiR-V when the radiation dose was reduced, without sacrificing image quality. In the patient study, the interobserver assessment of the data measurement demonstrated good agreement (ICC =0.774 for abdomen, 0.751 for chest). DLIR-H had the highest subjective and objective scores in the abdomen. Conclusions: Application of DLIR could help to reduce radiation dose without sacrificing the image quality of pediatric CT scans. Further clinical validation is required.

Indexed as

deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR)Pediatricsradiation dosageradiologic phantom

Identifiers

PMID35655845
PMCPMC9131348
OpenAlexW4282940065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.