ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Assessment of bone densitometry using radiography with a step-wedge phantom: a pilot study of the forearm.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology of brachydactyly type A3 in China: a nationwide multicentre population-based study among children aged 3-17 years.BMJ open · 2025Article
- An automatic deep learning-based bone mineral density measurement method using X-ray images of children.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Radiographic absorptiometry (RA) is one of the earliest methods of bone densitometry and has been used to measure the phalanges and metacarpals where soft tissue attenuation is minimal. The aim of this study was to determine whether the technique can be adapted to correct for soft tissue attenuation and measure areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in the forearm. Methods: A total of 51 patients referred for a clinical spine and hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination and 8 young and middle-aged volunteers were recruited to this study. The first 29 participants (20 women, 9 men, aged 61±14 years) served as the training cohort, and the remaining 30 (20 women, 10 men, aged 55±16 years) comprised the validation cohort. All participants underwent a DXA scan of their non-dominant forearm, and a digital X-ray image of the same arm was acquired with a step phantom. Identical regions of interest (ROIs) in the radius and ulna at the one-third radius site were measured on the X-ray and DXA images, and a soft tissue ROI was measured on X-ray images between the radius and ulna. The X-ray measurements in the training cohort were expressed as equivalent step phantom thickness (Eq. SPT) and used to estimate forearm aBMD using a linear equation calibrated against the DXA scans. Estimates of forearm aBMD made from the digital X-ray images acquired in the validation cohort were compared with the results of the DXA scans. Results: Digital X-ray estimates of radius and ulna aBMD at the one-third radius site in the validation cohort showed a good correlation with GE-Lunar iDXA scanner measurements (r=0.795; P<0.001). The Bland-Altman plot had a mean bias of -0.002 g/cm Conclusions: Digital X-ray estimates of proximal forearm aBMD corrected for soft tissue attenuation correlated with DXA measurements with correlation coefficients comparable to those seen for other peripheral bone densitometry technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.