ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Adversarial training for prostate cancer classification using magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Spectrogram Learning for Gunshot Classification: A Comparative Study of CNN Architectures and Time-Frequency Representations.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Improving the Robustness of Deep Learning Models in Predicting Hematoma Expansion from Admission Head CT.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- The impact of modifiable factors on image quality of prostate magnetic resonance imaging and PI-RADS scores.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Robust prostate disease classification using transformers with discrete representations.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Reduce the Interference of Rectal Artifacts in MRI-based Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Multimodal data integration for predicting progression risk in castration-resistant prostate cancer using deep learning: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- An artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis modeling software (AIMS) platform based on medical images and machine learning: a development and validation study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Multiparametric MRI: From Simultaneous Rapid Acquisition Methods and Analysis Techniques Using Scoring, Machine Learning, Radiomics, and Deep Learning to the Generation of Novel Metrics.Investigative radiology · 2023Review
- A lightweight neural network for lung nodule detection based on improved ghost module.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Normalization Strategies in Multi-Center Radiomics Abdominal MRI: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To use adversarial training to increase the generalizability and diagnostic accuracy of deep learning models for prostate cancer diagnosis. Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively included 396 prostate cancer patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (development set, 297 patients from Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital and Eighth People's Hospital; test set, 99 patients from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University). Two binary classification deep learning models for clinically significant prostate cancer classification [PM1, pretraining Visual Geometry Group network (VGGNet)-16-based model 1; PM2, pretraining residual network (ResNet)-50-based model 2] and two multiclass classification deep learning models for prostate cancer grading (PM3, pretraining VGGNet-16-based model 3; PM4: pretraining ResNet-50-based model 4) were built using apparent diffusion coefficient and T2-weighted images. These models were then retrained with adversarial examples starting from the initial random model parameters (AM1, adversarial training VGGNet-16 model 1; AM2, adversarial training ResNet-50 model 2; AM3, adversarial training VGGNet-16 model 3; AM4, adversarial training ResNet-50 model 4, respectively). To verify whether adversarial training can improve the diagnostic model's effectiveness, we compared the diagnostic performance of the deep learning methods before and after adversarial training. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate significant prostate cancer classification models. Differences in areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared using Delong's tests. The quadratic weighted kappa score was used to verify the PCa grading models. Results: AM1 and AM2 had significantly higher AUCs than PM1 and PM2 in the internal validation dataset (0.84 Conclusions: Using adversarial examples to train prostate cancer classification deep learning models can improve their generalizability and classification abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.