Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655828›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Subset selection strategy-based pancreas segmentation in CT.

Yi Huang, Jing Wen, Yi Wang, Jun Hu, Yizhu Wang, Weibin Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi HuangSchool of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Jing WenSchool of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Yi WangSchool of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Jun HuDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliate Hospital of Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yizhu WangZiwei King Star Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Hefei, China.
Weibin YangCenter for Intelligent Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods have been widely used in medical image analysis and have achieved great success in many medical segmentation tasks, these methods suffer from various imbalance problems, which reduce the accuracy and validity of segmentation results. Methods: We proposed two simple but effective sample balancing methods, positive-negative subset selection (PNSS) and hard-easy subset selection (HESS) for foreground-to-background imbalance and hard-to-easy imbalance problems in medical segmentation tasks. The PNSS method gradually reduces negative-easy slices to enhance the contribution of positive pixels, and the HESS method enhances the iteration of hard slices to assist the model in paying greater attention to the feature extraction of hard samples. Results: The proposed methods greatly improved the segmentation accuracy of the worst case (samples with the worst segmentation results) on the public National Institutes of Health (NIH) clinical center pancreatic segmentation dataset, and the minimum dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was improved by nearly 5%. Furthermore, performance gains were also observed with the proposed methods in liver segmentation (the minimum DSC increased from 75.03% to 84.29%), liver tumor segmentation (the minimum DSC increased from 20.92% to 35.73%), and brain tumor segmentation (the minimum DSC increased from 21.97% to 30.38%) on different neural networks. These results indicate that the proposed methods are effective and robust. Conclusions: Our proposed method can effectively alleviate foreground-to-background imbalance and hard-to-easy imbalance problems, and can improve segmentation accuracy, especially for the worst case, which guarantees the reliability of the proposed methods in clinical applications.

Indexed as

foreground-to-background imbalancehard-to-easy imbalanceSample balancing

Identifiers

PMID35655828
PMCPMC9131347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.