ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Subset selection strategy-based pancreas segmentation in CT.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods have been widely used in medical image analysis and have achieved great success in many medical segmentation tasks, these methods suffer from various imbalance problems, which reduce the accuracy and validity of segmentation results. Methods: We proposed two simple but effective sample balancing methods, positive-negative subset selection (PNSS) and hard-easy subset selection (HESS) for foreground-to-background imbalance and hard-to-easy imbalance problems in medical segmentation tasks. The PNSS method gradually reduces negative-easy slices to enhance the contribution of positive pixels, and the HESS method enhances the iteration of hard slices to assist the model in paying greater attention to the feature extraction of hard samples. Results: The proposed methods greatly improved the segmentation accuracy of the worst case (samples with the worst segmentation results) on the public National Institutes of Health (NIH) clinical center pancreatic segmentation dataset, and the minimum dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was improved by nearly 5%. Furthermore, performance gains were also observed with the proposed methods in liver segmentation (the minimum DSC increased from 75.03% to 84.29%), liver tumor segmentation (the minimum DSC increased from 20.92% to 35.73%), and brain tumor segmentation (the minimum DSC increased from 21.97% to 30.38%) on different neural networks. These results indicate that the proposed methods are effective and robust. Conclusions: Our proposed method can effectively alleviate foreground-to-background imbalance and hard-to-easy imbalance problems, and can improve segmentation accuracy, especially for the worst case, which guarantees the reliability of the proposed methods in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.