ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Bi-exponential fitting excluding
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A New Approach for Estimating Liver IVIM Fast Diffusion Coefficient in Two-Compartment Model and Fast Diffusion Fraction in Three-Compartment Model: Theory and In Vivo Validation of Two Centers' Data.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Advanced diffusion-weighted imaging of invasive tumor front for identification of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma: a proof-of-concept study.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Underestimation of liver hemangioma perfusion fraction by standard intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A prerequisite to translating intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging into meaningful clinical applications is sufficient scan-rescan reproducibility. This study aims to confirm the hypothesis that IVIM data fitting by not using Methods: Healthy volunteers' liver IVIM images were prospectively acquired using a 1.5-T magnet or a 3.0 T with 16 Results: Fitting without Conclusions: Scan-rescan repeatability and reproducibility of liver IVIM parameters can be improved by fitting without
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.