ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Modeling long-range dependencies for weakly supervised disease classification and localization on chest X-ray.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attention-Enhanced Hybrid Bidirectional LSTM and Temporal Convolutional Network for Early Detection of Lung Cancer in Low-Dose CT Scans.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Article
- A spatial correlation-guided deep fusion framework for multimodal lung cancer classification using CT imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A predictive nomogram of thyroid nodules based on deep learning ultrasound image analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Transformers in medical image segmentation: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computer-aided diagnosis based on chest X-ray (CXR) is an exponentially growing field of research owing to the development of deep learning, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, due to the intrinsic locality of convolution operations, CNNs cannot model long-range dependencies. Although vision transformers (ViTs) have recently been proposed to alleviate this limitation, those trained on patches cannot learn any dependencies for inter-patch pixels and thus, are insufficient for medical image detection. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose a CXR detection method which integrates CNN with a ViT for modeling patch-wise and inter-patch dependencies. Methods: We experimented on the ChestX-ray14 dataset and followed the official training-test set split. Because the training data only had global annotations, the detection network was weakly supervised. A DenseNet with a feature pyramid structure was designed and integrated with an adaptive ViT to model inter-patch and patch-wise long-range dependencies and obtain fine-grained feature maps. We compared the performance using our method with that of other disease detection methods. Results: For disease classification, our method achieved the best result among all the disease detection methods, with a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829. For lesion localization, our method achieved significantly higher intersection of the union (IoU) scores on the test images with bounding box annotations than did the other detection methods. The visualized results showed that our predictions were more accurate and detailed. Furthermore, evaluation of our method in an external validation dataset demonstrated its generalization ability. Conclusions: Our proposed method achieves the new state of the art for thoracic disease classification and weakly supervised localization. It has potential to assist in clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.