Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35655821›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of fetal vertebral abnormalities in utero: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Xianyun Cai, Xin Chen, Xinhong Wei, Wen Liu, Ximan Hou, Tao Gong, Jinxia Zhu, Ewart Mark Haacke, Guangbin Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xianyun CaiCheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Xinhong WeiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Wen LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Ximan HouCheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Tao GongDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Jinxia ZhuMR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Beijing, China.
Ewart Mark HaackeDepartment of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Guangbin WangCheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shandong First Medical University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CNSiemens (China) · CNWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used increasingly as an adjunct examination to ultrasound (US) for the evaluation of fetal anomalies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the accuracy and confidence of diagnosing fetal vertebral anomalies are improved with MRI. We also assessed whether fetal MRI provides additional information when diagnosing fetal vertebral anomalies. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective study of 127 pregnant women with fetuses suspected of having vertebral anomalies on US examination; women also underwent fetal MRI scanning. Comparisons of diagnostic accuracy and confidence were made between MRI and US for the identification of fetal vertebral anomalies. We also assessed any additional information provided by MRI. McNemar's paired binomial test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test were used to compare the diagnostic ability between MRI and US. In all cases, postnatal or postmortem imaging findings were used as reference standards. Results: A total of 127 participants were recruited between December 2015 and January 2021. Fetal vertebral anomalies were detected in 63.8% (81/127) cases and found to be negative in 36.2% (46/127) of cases at follow up. The diagnostic accuracy of vertebral anomalies was 46.9% (38/81) for US and 84.0% (68/81) for MRI [difference, 37.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 27% to 48%; P<0.001]. Both MRI and US were concordant and correct in 36.2% (46/127) of fetuses; MRI provided additional information for 16.5% (21/127) of fetuses, and corrected US diagnoses of 36.2% (46/127) of fetuses; both MRI and US were not consistent with postnatal findings in 10.2% (13/127) of fetuses, and the remaining fetus (0.8%, 1/127) was diagnosed correctly using US but failed to be diagnosed by MRI. Diagnoses were reported with high confidence using MRI in 95.3% (121/127) of cases and 73.2% (93/127) using US. Conclusions: Fetal vertebral MRI improves the accuracy and confidence of diagnosing fetal vertebral anomalies. This finding indicates that fetal MRI supplements the information provided by US and that MRI may be a good complement in selected fetuses, when US can either not achieve a definite diagnosis or there is doubt regarding its reliability. Thus, MRI may be used to inform prenatal counseling and management decisions.

Indexed as

Fetal imagingfetal vertebrafetal vertebral anomaliesultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35655821
PMCPMC9131323
OpenAlexW4248955338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.